Norway’s Shocking Response to a Mass Child Killer

CChris Williamson
도서/문학다이어트/영양정신 건강

Transcript

00:00:00In my new book, I talk about this trial that took place in Norway when there was, you know,
00:00:09Norway has so much less crime, so much less violent crime than the United States does.
00:00:15They incarcerate way fewer people.
00:00:17They incarcerate them in less harsh institutions for much shorter periods of time.
00:00:23And it's very rare for them to have, like, a mass shooting event.
00:00:27But they did.
00:00:30They had this guy, Anders Breivik, who shot, I think, 60 children on an island.
00:00:38They were there for a summer camp.
00:00:40It was the worst mass murder in Norway's history.
00:00:44This is someone who had terrible genetic and environmental luck.
00:00:49He had a very unstable mother.
00:00:53And it also -- he was described as someone who was antisocial from the time he was three
00:00:57or four.
00:00:59Norway has this incredible wraparound social welfare state.
00:01:03And so you can see the --
00:01:06High visibility.
00:01:07-- the notes from the social worker being, like, this child is aggressive and violent.
00:01:12The other kids won't be -- aren't allowed to play with him because he keeps torturing their
00:01:14pets when he's five.
00:01:17So even in this environment where there's incredible social resources, this person still grew up
00:01:24and still grew up to be violent.
00:01:26I found the trial fascinating because they ultimately sentenced him to the maximum sentence
00:01:36in Norway, which is 21 years.
00:01:38Doesn't seem like a lot.
00:01:39It's what, like, four months per child?
00:01:43And they gave him -- he's in the maximum security prison, which there was an Instagram meme,
00:01:50which is, is this a Norwegian prison or a London hotel room?
00:01:55And people can't tell the difference between them.
00:01:57The only thing that puts it away is the security camera dome on the ceiling of the prison room.
00:02:03So things that seem quite cushy for an American system.
00:02:08And in the trial, you see the reckoning of a society where they are saying, this person
00:02:17did a horrible thing.
00:02:19We have our maximum retributive impulses towards him.
00:02:24Of course we do.
00:02:25He murdered our children.
00:02:28And he is still one of us.
00:02:30And how will it corrupt us and our culture to indulge those maximum impulses?
00:02:36So we want to keep our society safe, but we're recognizing that he's still one of us.
00:02:42He's still Norwegian.
00:02:43He's still part of our society.
00:02:45And from an American perspective, it was wild, like, reading this trial transcript because
00:02:52it was a way of feeling that retribution, but not leading entirely with it and also recognizing
00:03:04the inherent humanity of this person who's part of their society.
00:03:09Do you think somebody that shot 60 kids has that much humanity?
00:03:12I think we all have that humanity.
00:03:15I mean, I think that's what it comes down to.
00:03:16I think that every single person, even when they do horrible things, is still human.
00:03:23And also that even if they don't, that me treating them like they don't does something to my humanity.
00:03:31That seems to be two different arguments.
00:03:34They are.
00:03:35So they're related.
00:03:36Yeah, of course.
00:03:37Yeah.
00:03:38I'm trying to separate them out.
00:03:39I mean, yeah.
00:03:40I was going to try, I was about to say something before that my ability to flip empathy into
00:03:48pleasure at a defect as pain pathway is defunct.
00:03:55I always seem to err on the side of, "Oh, I'm so sorry for that person."
00:04:01Always, always, always.
00:04:05You've managed to find an example where, not just one, but it tends to be, my threshold
00:04:10for it tends to be a bit higher.
00:04:12So I'm thinking about this person that shot 60 kids.
00:04:19The residual amount of humanity in that person seems to be very low for me in how I would
00:04:24see them.
00:04:26That to me seems to be the kind of thing, even if you were to say, "What does this do for
00:04:30society outside of it?"
00:04:32That is such a heinous crime, I'd say.
00:04:37It is so far beyond even the normality of abnormal crime that that should be a, you don't get
00:04:47to come out again.
00:04:48And that would be a pro-social, as far as I can see, that would be a pro-social thing to
00:04:51do.
00:04:52I would say, "Hey, we have a limit here in Sweden."
00:04:56Norway.
00:04:57Norway.
00:04:58"Here in Norway, we have a limit.
00:05:00We may be very loving and a fun accent, like a typewriter covered in foil kicked downstairs,
00:05:06but this person has gone beyond the limit, therefore, other people shouldn't."
00:05:13So I guess warning them off.
00:05:16But the other one being like, that is such an extreme crime.
00:05:22The likelihood of ... Even if his desire to murder children drops by one per year over
00:05:29the next six decades, he still wants to murder a child.
00:05:35I'm aware that's not the way that a fall off a murder desire was.
00:05:38I got this weird line graph in my head.
00:05:42Of course.
00:05:43It's murder, desire, inertia, or whatever the fuck.
00:05:48To me, that seems weak.
00:05:49That seems wimpy.
00:05:50But I don't think that that is a sufficient deterrent to others, and I also don't think
00:05:55it is a sufficient amount of time to basically quarantine this person.
00:06:00So there's so many different threads in your argument, and I want to pull them apart because
00:06:06I think they're each interesting.
00:06:07And in some ways, it's like you just touched on why do we incarcerate people?
00:06:13Why do we have a criminal legal system?
00:06:15What is the purpose of it, right?
00:06:17And one is just containment, just protecting the other people from this person, right?
00:06:25I do believe in Norway, it's possible that at the end of the sentence, he's judged to
00:06:30still be a risk to others than he could be ... That sentence could be lengthened for the
00:06:34sake of other people.
00:06:37One is some sort of expression of retribution.
00:06:42I don't care if you could be better in the future.
00:06:45I don't care if you're going to have a- You lost that privilege.
00:06:48You've lost the privilege.
00:06:52You did something that's beyond the pale, and now you deserve to not live.
00:06:58You deserve to suffer.
00:06:59You deserve whatever that is.
00:07:01And then one of them is rehabilitation.
00:07:05So given that someone has done this, is there some intervention by the state, by other people
00:07:14that can prevent it from happening again, essentially repair this person, and repair their relationship
00:07:23to the community, such that they don't commit any more violent crime?
00:07:30And we don't stick with ... We don't have one lane.
00:07:34Your answer combined all of those things, where you're like, "But what if he's still a danger,
00:07:40and also he did such a horrible thing.
00:07:42Maybe it doesn't matter if he's a danger, and also if this is such a long-rooted problem,
00:07:47how could he ever hope to change?"
00:07:51I'm really interested by the word weak.
00:07:55What is it?
00:07:56It's weak by the state.
00:07:58It's weak by the juror.
00:08:02It reflects weak social bonds.
00:08:05What is being weak where?
00:08:09That's an interesting ... It is insufficient when held up.
00:08:20You asked me earlier on, this person stabbed one guy with a boxcar.
00:08:23Yeah, and you're like 25 years.
00:08:24Yeah, I gave him 20 years.
00:08:26Homeboy managed to do it to 60 children.
00:08:29Have you considered the role of 120 parents needing to feel vindicated?
00:08:40I mean, I think there's this idea of vindication and also this sense of ... I guess I should
00:08:47say I was very moved by this outcome.
00:08:49I'm not saying that you're defending the guy just doing the thing or getting the 20 years.
00:08:53But I do think it speaks to a very different way of thinking of the role and function of
00:08:59punishment in a society, because it is so radically different from what we would do in the United
00:09:03States.
00:09:04But I just want to echo, I'm a mother.
00:09:06I have three kids.
00:09:08If I were one of those parents, would I be able to coolly sit here and talk to you about
00:09:13not letting the retributive instinct lead?
00:09:16I'm not sure.
00:09:17The only time I've ever blacked out in anger was when someone hurt one of my children.
00:09:22I think there's a really basic thing in there.
00:09:24And I think the other thing that you're getting at is we signal the value of people by how
00:09:34much we're willing to punish others who've hurt them.
00:09:39So when we say one of the things that denotes or it comes along with the status of being
00:09:53an enslaved person in a culture is that their masters get to hurt them, and there's no punishment
00:10:01for that, right?
00:10:03So I think one of the things you're picking up on when you say, "What about those parents?"
00:10:09is does it signal something about the value of those children or the value of those children
00:10:15to their parents or their society, to the collective, if someone is not punished for hurting them?
00:10:24A lot of times when someone does something outrageous, not even outrageous as mass murder,
00:10:31we say, "Who do you think you are?"
00:10:36And I think that's saying, "Who do you think I am that you think you can get away with treating
00:10:41me like this?"
00:10:42So we assert the value of people.
00:10:43Correct.
00:10:44That's part of the social signal of punishment.
00:10:45And I think that's why it rankles.
00:10:49And I don't think there's any response to harm, especially harm at that level where there isn't
00:10:59going to be some remainder that feels unsatisfying.
00:11:03Kill him.
00:11:06Burn him and kill him.
00:11:07String him up and burn him and kill him.
00:11:08What does that do to us, right?
00:11:10I think what does that do to our society's, again, honoring of the inherent value of every
00:11:22human if we are so easy for anyone to say, "String him up," good riddance?
00:11:30There is a really that our response to our most antisocial people can bring out the most
00:11:37callous and unemotional and anti-social instincts of ourselves where you would never and under
00:11:45any circumstances be like, "Let him die," but in this case, it comes so easily to us.
00:11:52So again, I don't think there is a perfect solution to the problem of harm, but I do think
00:11:58by looking to other societies, we can begin to think, "Well, what are we overemphasizing
00:12:05in our approach to this?"
00:12:07Which is very people deserve to suffer, and our job is just to figure out how much they
00:12:13deserve to suffer.
00:12:14Before we continue, I've been drinking AG1 every morning for as long as I can remember
00:12:20now because it is the simplest way I've found to cover my bases and not overthink nutrition,
00:12:25and that is why I partnered with them.
00:12:27Just one scoop gives you 75 vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and whole food ingredients in
00:12:31a single drink.
00:12:32Now they've taken it a step further with AG1 NextGen, the same one scoop, once a day ritual,
00:12:38but this time backed by four clinical trials.
00:12:40In those trials, it was shown to fill common nutrient gaps, improve key nutrient levels
00:12:44in just three months, and increase healthy gut bacteria by 10 times even in people who
00:12:48already eat well.
00:12:50They've upgraded their formula with better probiotics, more bioavailable nutrients, and
00:12:54clinical validation.
00:12:55Plus, it's still NSF certified for sport, so you know that the quality is legit.
00:12:59Right now, when you first subscribe, you can get a free bottle of D3K2 and AG1 Welcome Kit,
00:13:04plus bonus AG1 travel packs.
00:13:06And for a limited time, US customers also get a sample of AGZ and a bottle of Omega 3s.
00:13:11Just go to the link in the description below or head to drinkag1.com/modernwisdom.
00:13:17That's drinkag1.com/modernwisdom.
00:13:22Thank you very much for tuning in, ooh, a tasty morsel of a clip there for you.
00:13:26Well, the full episode is available right here.
00:13:30Come on.
00:13:31That's it.

Key Takeaway

The Norwegian response to mass tragedy highlights a radical commitment to humane rehabilitation and the preservation of societal values over the instinctive desire for maximum retribution.

Highlights

Norway's criminal justice system focuses on rehabilitation and maintaining social bonds rather than maximum retribution.

Anders Breivik, responsible for Norway's worst mass murder, received a 21-year sentence, which is the statutory maximum.

Norwegian prisons prioritize humane conditions, often appearing comparable to hotel rooms to preserve the dignity of inmates.

The societal debate in Norway centered on whether indulging retributive impulses would corrupt their own culture's humanity.

Punishment serves multiple functions, including containment, retribution, and rehabilitation, which often conflict in extreme cases.

The speaker argues that even perpetrators of heinous crimes remain human, and treating them otherwise impacts the humanity of the state.

Timeline

Introduction to the Norwegian Justice System

The speaker introduces a case study from her book regarding the 2011 Norway attacks committed by Anders Breivik. She notes that Norway typically experiences significantly lower rates of violent crime and incarceration compared to the United States. Breivik's background is described as a combination of genetic and environmental misfortune, involving an unstable upbringing and early signs of antisocial behavior. Despite Norway's robust social welfare state and early intervention by social workers, the subject still escalated to extreme violence. This section establishes the contrast between a high-resource society and a singular, devastating failure of social prevention.

The Trial and the Retributive Impulse

The discussion shifts to the trial where Breivik was sentenced to 21 years, a duration that seems remarkably short from an American perspective. Norwegian prisons are described as 'cushy,' with high-security facilities resembling modern hotel rooms except for the presence of security cameras. The trial forced Norwegian society to reconcile their natural desire for revenge with their foundational belief that every citizen, including a killer, is 'one of us.' The speaker reflects on how transcripts revealed a society struggling not to let retribution corrupt their collective culture. This tension highlights the philosophical gap between systems based on punishment versus those based on inherent human dignity.

Debating Humanity and the Purpose of Incarceration

The interviewer challenges the idea that a mass murderer retains humanity, suggesting that for such heinous crimes, the residual humanity is effectively zero. The speaker responds by arguing that recognizing a criminal's humanity is essential for the state to maintain its own moral standing. The conversation explores the 'pro-social' argument for permanent quarantine, with the interviewer suggesting that 21 years is an insufficient deterrent or safety measure. He posits that a person who murders 60 children has crossed a limit that warrants permanent exclusion from society. This exchange delves into the psychological difficulty of balancing empathy with the necessity of public safety.

Three Pillars of the Criminal Legal System

The speaker deconstructs the reasons for incarceration into three distinct categories: containment, retribution, and rehabilitation. Containment focuses on protecting the public, while retribution is an expression of the idea that a perpetrator 'deserves' to suffer for their actions. Rehabilitation aims to repair the individual's relationship with the community to prevent future violence. She points out that Norway's system allows for the extension of a sentence if a person remains a threat, addressing the concern of premature release. The dialogue examines how these three goals often overlap and compete within a single legal judgment.

Societal Signaling and the Value of Victims

The discussion addresses the impact of sentencing on victims' families and the signal it sends about the value of the lives lost. The speaker acknowledges that as a mother, her own retributive instincts would be powerful, yet she questions what 'stringing them up' does to the fabric of society. She explains that societies often signal the status and value of people by how harshly they punish those who harm them. Ultimately, she suggests that while no solution to extreme harm is perfectly satisfying, the Norwegian model offers a way to avoid the 'callous and unemotional' instincts that revenge can provoke. This concluding section emphasizes the importance of looking at alternative legal frameworks to evaluate our own emphasis on suffering.

Sponsorship and Closing Remarks

The final segment of the video features a promotional advertisement for AG1, where the host describes his long-term nutritional routine. He details the benefits of the supplement, including vitamins, minerals, and probiotics backed by clinical trials. Following the advertisement, the host provides a brief outro, inviting viewers to watch the full episode of the podcast. The video concludes with a prompt for the audience to engage with more content from the 'Modern Wisdom' channel. This transition marks the end of the thematic discussion on justice and shifts toward personal wellness and channel growth.

Community Posts

View all posts