3 weird ways of companies freaking out because of AI

MMaximilian Schwarzmüller
경영/리더십경제 뉴스컴퓨터/소프트웨어

Transcript

00:00:00When it comes to
00:00:02companies using AI
00:00:04We are probably here when it comes to the current hype about AI
00:00:10I'm not sure if we reached the maximum the top yet, but we definitely are at a very high point
00:00:17Now obviously, I'm kind of no exception. I create a lot of content about AI
00:00:23I have courses on AI courses on codecs cloud code and much more because it is a thing it is
00:00:31Useful, it's changing how we build software
00:00:35There is no way around it
00:00:36And I mean I have made it very very clear how I feel about
00:00:43AI for coding and that I personally had more fun
00:00:47That I enjoyed writing code before we had AI but it is what it is
00:00:52And of course nothing stopping me from still writing code by hand, but if you are doing serious
00:00:58Development work if you're building software
00:01:01Yeah, AI can make you more productive and not using it is a valid choice
00:01:07But in most cases probably not the right one if you're doing it professionally that is my opinion at least
00:01:15Now that does not change though that we are
00:01:20Really at a top point regarding hype
00:01:24regarding AI in companies and
00:01:27Maybe we'll go to even higher heights now of course when I say AI in companies. I'm fully aware that there is
00:01:36Technically not an endless amount of companies
00:01:39But there are of course many many companies all over the world and the use of AI is not evenly distributed
00:01:46And of course I'm also mainly talking about tech about software oriented companies here
00:01:52But when we talk or when we look at the use of AI in companies
00:01:58there are a couple of
00:02:00Interesting and kind of worrying trends we have to to talk about we have to look at
00:02:08one big trend we saw over the last couple of weeks or
00:02:13We heard about the last couple of weeks is for example
00:02:16token maxing
00:02:19Token maxing of course means that for some companies more AI use is better
00:02:25That's it
00:02:28there are
00:02:30reportedly companies that had or have
00:02:33internal leaderboards that track how many
00:02:37tokens their
00:02:39software developers or employees in general spend on AI and
00:02:45well, that is a bit like tracking just the lines of code you generate as a
00:02:52Measure of how good you're doing. It's a bad measure of course
00:02:57And I probably don't need to tell you that it should be pretty obvious that just spending a lot of tokens is
00:03:03Not a good measure to measure how productive you are I mean for one
00:03:09It's easy to game you can just send pointless prompts to the AI or have it do pointless
00:03:15Meaningless work and that allows you to max out your tokens, but even if you're not doing that
00:03:21Which developer is probably better the one that puts some thought?
00:03:29into a problem that
00:03:32Analyzes the result the AI gives them or suggests and that analyzes the code
00:03:38or the vibe coder that just prompts away and
00:03:42Produces tons of tokens and output for some companies. It seems to be number two for me. It's definitely number one. I
00:03:51Think the the magic thing about the AI and where you really can get a lot of use out of it
00:03:58Right now is if you do combine your expertise with the advantages of AI
00:04:05Which of course are that you can move fast that you have an infinitely patient
00:04:10Mentor where you can ask questions that you can kind of combine two brains though
00:04:16You should really trust your brain a bit more in in most situations
00:04:20Yeah, you can get advantages out of AI but token maxing is probably not it but it is a trend we
00:04:28See what we heard about in some companies though
00:04:31of course now that it got public some of these companies like meta for example already announced that they were kind of
00:04:37Getting rid of that leaderboard or of that strong incentive to max out tokens
00:04:43But it still is a thing for some companies out there as it seems another
00:04:48Trend I I saw more and more over the last week is that there are companies like
00:04:55McKinsey
00:04:56that really like to
00:04:59Push the narrative of AI agents as employees
00:05:04So the McKinsey CEO here said that they would have 60,000 employees. We're
00:05:0925,000 of them are AI agents and only around 40,000 are humans
00:05:15So AI agents as workforce is something I've also seen here and there and yeah
00:05:22Of course, that is one way of looking at it, I guess
00:05:26but then again, I
00:05:29Don't know. I mean for one right now
00:05:32We're at a point in time where most all AI agents are pretty
00:05:38Specialized regarding what they can do. Whereas humans tend to be more
00:05:44Versatile in what they can do and what they can be taught
00:05:48So I'm not sure if that comparison really makes a lot of sense. I mean who would have thought of
00:05:55calling your backup script an
00:05:58Employee that you might have had in 2018 already, right? So we had automations
00:06:03We had workflows before AI and we that makes a lot of sense
00:06:08Obviously we have automated deploy processes backup processes web scrapers data analysis processes
00:06:15We have all kinds of automations and we have them for 10 20 years or longer
00:06:20but now it's the AI agents that we call parts of the workforce and
00:06:26Don't get me wrong. You can do useful stuff with AI agents
00:06:31I'm personally not fully on board with the open claw hype because I personally
00:06:36Still am not able to get a lot of useful
00:06:41Usage out of it. I haven't found those use cases that really are magical to me when it comes to open claw
00:06:49But I am using cloud code and codecs for coding but also for more than that
00:06:55I am using the pie agent which is an open source
00:07:00Independent AI agent that you can for example use with your chat GPT subscription
00:07:05I am using that for doing all kinds of stuff on my machine or on my VPS to have it analyze log files
00:07:12Is that an employee? I'm not so sure though
00:07:16It's a useful tool for sure
00:07:19And I wouldn't even know how to count that if I have two employees and each of them is using this agent
00:07:25Are that then two additional employees or is it the agent still just one employee used by multiple other employees?
00:07:34I don't know. But yeah, this is something you also see here and there and obviously there is a lot of marketing involved here
00:07:41obviously you wanna be the company that knows how to do AI and that is on the on the
00:07:48forefront of getting the most out of AI and obviously that is a narrative that would benefit a consulting company like
00:07:55Kinsey so I get it where they're coming from. But that is yeah, it's it's it's a weird trend. I will say that
00:08:03for sure another
00:08:05Interesting trend I saw is kind of related to the token maxing. I guess it's
00:08:11Mandated use now with that. However, I don't mean that you are required to use AI as much as possible
00:08:19But you are forced to use it
00:08:23Often or in some cases also specific models or agents
00:08:29so that is something that goes hand in hand with that mandated use in in some companies out there at least and
00:08:37This is a point I do get to some degree because I do
00:08:41Understand that as a company you want to make sure that your employees
00:08:47experiment with this new technology and try to find out where it's useful because I
00:08:53Think there is a decent
00:08:55amount of people that
00:08:57Used chat GPT the free version a couple of months back or anything like that
00:09:04Or they use it here and there and it's okay, but it it doesn't seem super impressive and
00:09:10Especially amongst the normal people that are not in this tech bubble the share of people
00:09:17That are in that bucket that don't regularly use cutting-edge models is very likely
00:09:24very very high so I get why companies want to incentivize or push you to
00:09:30actively use AI to give it a try to try to use it in your day-to-day work and
00:09:35That works best. Of course if you then also get access to the more capable models
00:09:43I mean if I force you to work with an AI model, that's two years old that doesn't have any extra
00:09:48Capabilities because it's not running in any harness that would give it those capabilities
00:09:53That would be pretty meaningless
00:09:55But I do understand why companies want employees to play around with AI now needless to say some companies are
00:10:03Definitely pushing too far and there is no sense in
00:10:08forcing employees to do everything with AI and I think you should also
00:10:13Try to trust your employees when they tell you that a certain task can't be done with AI or at least
00:10:20Can't be done better with AI. But of course, I understand
00:10:24That companies can also doubt whether employees really engaged with AI and it's easy to push back
00:10:32against the new technology obviously also because many people are afraid and how wouldn't you with Dario Amodei basically
00:10:40Going on to a talk show or interview every week telling people that the vast majority
00:10:45Of white-collar workers will lose their jobs. I get it many people are afraid so it's easy to push back against AI
00:10:53But I've said it before in other episodes and I strongly believe in it
00:10:57The only way to deal with this new technology
00:11:01Just as with all new technologies in the past is to really
00:11:07Embrace it and try to get the most out of it. That does not mean that you want to blindly trust it
00:11:13That does also not mean that you want to use it for everything
00:11:16but it means that you should
00:11:19Seriously try to use it to see where it can help you that you want to push it to the limits and especially with AI
00:11:25Where everything is changing so rapidly all the time
00:11:28You really also want to reevaluate
00:11:32Regularly every few months or so because things change the models change but more importantly
00:11:38and I've said that in other episodes too, but more importantly the the harnesses the tools around these models also evolve the
00:11:46agents the agentic harnesses in which these models runs out to say those also evolve and therefore it's it's very
00:11:54Likely or it's possible that you can do something today with AI that you couldn't do a couple of months back
00:12:00so I get this but it's of course clear that some companies are taking this too far and
00:12:06Forcing employees to do something with AI that just doesn't work with AI or where you're more efficient without AI
00:12:14of course is kind of
00:12:16overshooting that target of of
00:12:18Incentivizing the workforce to use AI but yeah, this is where we are
00:12:24That is the weird state in which we are right now. And I I have not really been part of earlier
00:12:30Technological revolutions we went through in the past
00:12:33I mean sure the the Internet the mainstream adoption of the Internet happened whilst I was alive
00:12:40But I was a child back then when the Internet became a thing. So I wasn't part of the workforce
00:12:48it's very likely pretty normal for things to be rough and weird whenever such a
00:12:55Transition or evolution happens, of course with AI
00:12:58it is probably especially rough because everything is going so fast and
00:13:03Due to it going so fast and the way it works and what people like Dario tell you all the time
00:13:10It's also super frightening. So yeah
00:13:14All these things combined. It makes a lot of sense that things are very very weird
00:13:20And again, as I mentioned before
00:13:22for me
00:13:24Definitely - I had more joy in the coding part before AI was a thing. But here we are and
00:13:31yeah, definitely right now many companies are here and we'll see if we continue like this or if you find a more
00:13:40meaningful reasonable path forward where we can really try to get the most out of AI instead of just using
00:13:47the most AI
00:13:49without the use part

Key Takeaway

Maximizing raw AI token consumption is a flawed performance metric that ignores the necessity of combining human expertise with AI tools to achieve meaningful productivity gains.

Highlights

Companies track employee AI usage via internal leaderboards that count total tokens consumed.

Some organizations, such as McKinsey, have declared AI agents as a portion of their official headcount.

Mandatory AI usage policies aim to overcome employee hesitation and increase familiarity with current models.

Token-based performance metrics are easily gamed by submitting meaningless prompts to AI systems.

Combining human domain expertise with AI speed yields higher productivity than automated token generation.

Timeline

The Pitfalls of Token Maxing

  • Internal leaderboards tracking AI token usage serve as a flawed proxy for developer productivity.
  • Token volume is easily manipulated through irrelevant or meaningless prompts.
  • High-quality development outcomes require critical analysis of AI output rather than high-volume output generation.

Companies currently use token counts to measure AI integration, drawing a parallel to the ineffective practice of measuring developer success by lines of code generated. This metric incentivizes volume over quality, as employees can simply prompt the model with meaningless tasks to inflate their score. Real productivity occurs when human expertise guides the AI, whereas 'token maxing' risks prioritizing quantity over substantive engineering.

AI Agents as Corporate Workforce

  • Consulting firms classify AI agents as employees to frame technological shifts within existing workforce structures.
  • Categorizing automated scripts as employees obscures the distinction between long-standing automation workflows and modern AI agents.
  • The current generation of AI agents remains highly specialized compared to the versatility of human employees.

Marketing narratives, such as the claim of thousands of AI agents functioning as employees, attempt to package standard automation processes as something novel. While tools like independent AI agents on a VPS provide utility for log analysis or local tasks, labeling these scripts as part of the headcount creates ambiguity. This framing often serves marketing goals rather than reflecting the actual operational reality of how AI supplements human labor.

Mandated AI Adoption and Future Strategy

  • Companies mandate AI use to ensure employees move beyond basic, free model experiences.
  • Forcing AI use for every task overshoots the goal of incentive-based adoption.
  • Rapid technological evolution necessitates re-evaluating AI tools and agentic harnesses every few months.

Mandatory AI policies exist because many employees outside of the immediate tech sector do not regularly engage with advanced models. While firms correctly identify that experimentation is required to realize value, excessive enforcement leads to efficiency losses when employees are forced to use AI for tasks better performed manually. Staying effective involves a continuous cycle of experimentation and reassessment as model capabilities and agentic toolsets evolve.

Community Posts

View all posts