The Serious Benefits Of Retardmaxxing - Andrew Huberman

CChris Williamson
정신 건강경영/리더십

Transcript

00:00:00Are you threatened by the retard maxing movement?
00:00:04Have you heard about this?
00:00:04That's a great question.
00:00:05That's a great question.
00:00:06That's a good question.
00:00:08He looks right at me.
00:00:08Yeah.
00:00:09Yeah.
00:00:10Let me answer that the way I think you intended it.
00:00:12Yes.
00:00:12I am personally offended.
00:00:14Threatened, threatened, threatened.
00:00:16Are you like, I'm retard maxing today?
00:00:19I think is that what you think?
00:00:20What is retard maxing?
00:00:22All right.
00:00:22All right.
00:00:23It's awesome.
00:00:24No, I actually.
00:00:26What is this?
00:00:27I heard of look maxing.
00:00:29Yeah.
00:00:29There's look maxing.
00:00:30Then there's a guy who does what's called retard maxing,
00:00:33which is was popularized by of all people, Mark Andresen,
00:00:37who's easily one of the smartest people I've ever known.
00:00:40Mark real well.
00:00:42He's a big fan of retard maxing.
00:00:43Retard maxing is this guy on the internet who like what?
00:00:48You want to explain?
00:00:49Oh, I'm loving that.
00:00:50So, you know, with all the stuff about get up in the morning
00:00:53and, you know, do this and do that.
00:00:54And, you know, when you have a problem or all the kind of stuff
00:00:56that, you know, Chris covers, you know, like about emerging
00:01:01dynamics of male female relationships and self-perception
00:01:04and philosophy and he interviews like, you know, real thinkers
00:01:07and they have British accents and that kind of thing.
00:01:09This guy sits in his backyard is basically a farm.
00:01:12And he has this thing that he calls retard maxing, which is
00:01:15where you basically just don't think about shit at all.
00:01:17You just do what needs to be done.
00:01:19If something bothers you, you just ignore it.
00:01:21Wait, is this the CEO that is like, I don't self-reflect.
00:01:26So Marc Andreessen came on the David Sen...
00:01:29Yeah, so Marc Andreessen started Netscape.
00:01:31Right.
00:01:31And now he has A16Z, which is one of the, you know,
00:01:34biggest investment firms in the Bay Area and all over the world, frankly.
00:01:38And he came on the David Senra podcast, which is the guy
00:01:43who also does the Founders podcast.
00:01:45David Senra podcast, incidentally, put out by Sycom.
00:01:48We loved the Founders podcast.
00:01:50So we brought Senra over and he brought Marc Andreessen on.
00:01:53And Marc Andreessen said, he used the words, these are not my words.
00:01:56He said, "Great men of history did not sit around thinking
00:02:00about their thoughts and introspecting."
00:02:02You know, like introspection is not what we need to be doing.
00:02:04We need more action, less introspection.
00:02:06Yeah.
00:02:06Actually, Dana White kind of doubled down on this recently.
00:02:08I watched the clip.
00:02:08Saying that he's not, he is not a fan of people, men talking
00:02:14about their emotional challenges publicly.
00:02:17You know, that it's like, get up, go to war, make money for your family.
00:02:20You know, sort of the old school kind of stoicism thing.
00:02:23So the Marc Andreessen thing mobilized a big discussion online
00:02:28on X in particular.
00:02:29One sort of angle of attack that he opened was, oh, here's a billionaire
00:02:33who doesn't like introspection.
00:02:35And, you know, and I know Marc very well.
00:02:37He's not a sociopath.
00:02:38He's not, he's a very, very kind person.
00:02:40I know his family.
00:02:40He's an incredible human being at many levels.
00:02:43I'm going to catch a lot of shit for saying that, but that's the truth.
00:02:46If you actually know him.
00:02:47All right.
00:02:48And now he's retarded.
00:02:49Now he then made a try for retard max and he was like, hey, there's
00:02:53this guy on the internet who basically doesn't say shit at all.
00:02:55He just says, just handle your business.
00:02:57Do what you need to do and stop thinking about things so much.
00:03:00Don't ruminate so much.
00:03:01And he said he was a big fan of this retard max.
00:03:05So building off looks max.
00:03:06And then that caught some momentum.
00:03:10And so now the big thing is introspection.
00:03:13Like, should we introspect?
00:03:14We think about and reflect on who we are and what's challenging us.
00:03:18And Dana was basically saying, Hey, listen, a lot.
00:03:20I think the point Daniel was trying to make was that men's mental health,
00:03:24while critical, right?
00:03:26Suicide rates are way up.
00:03:27Like we all acknowledge that.
00:03:28He made a very good point, which is oftentimes getting into action
00:03:31and doing things as opposed to being online and thinking about your problems.
00:03:34And rumination is a very dangerous place to be.
00:03:37Yeah.
00:03:38So he said, get up and work and provide for your family.
00:03:41And, but when he and Mark said these things, it came across as a little bit
00:03:45dismissive of the idea that emotions are relevant.
00:03:49And I do think, you know, they have a point in the sense that I think we need to
00:03:54balance out some of what we've been hearing a lot of over the last few years.
00:03:56Sure.
00:03:57Which is that we need to think about every aspect of self, every aspect, you know,
00:04:00like, Oh, too much therapy is not, not good.
00:04:03Yeah.
00:04:03If you spend your time just like thinking and not doing so.
00:04:07Cause it feels like that's kind of the, the note behind the note, right?
00:04:10Is like, if you just sit and introspect and think, and you just sit in like, I feel this
00:04:16way and you never actually take action, then you're just literally not doing anything.
00:04:20Yeah.
00:04:20But I think there's kind of levels to like, I think it's good to, to be introspective
00:04:26to a degree, check in with yourself, you know, express how you feel, but don't just sit
00:04:31there and say, this is how I feel.
00:04:32And then don't do anything.
00:04:34Yeah.
00:04:34I mean, there's a, there's a kind of a larger, perhaps deeper discussion around
00:04:39like to what it, and Marc Andreessen said this as well, like people who've tended to
00:04:43accomplish a lot of great things, oftentimes have some pretty rough edges.
00:04:47Yeah.
00:04:47I grew up in the town where Steve Jobs was around.
00:04:49He used to come in and get roller blade wheels at the skateboard shop where I worked.
00:04:51And like, he was kind of a rough edge guy and he didn't wear shoes and you know, he
00:04:55wanted what he wanted.
00:04:56He wanted it.
00:04:56Then he was known for yelling at people who drive 95 miles, but like you, not even this
00:05:00guy likes to drive fast.
00:05:03You know, he got, you know, and so there was this site, there was this time up until phones
00:05:07with cameras.
00:05:09Thank you, Steve Jobs.
00:05:10There was this time up until phones with cameras where people were kind of celebrated for being
00:05:15big personalities with some rough edges, but for the great things that they did.
00:05:21Now it's, there's a movement largely from the left of like, hey, you know, everything
00:05:26needs to be rather tempered, right?
00:05:28You can't be a big personality unless you're perfect in every dimension.
00:05:32And if you look, I mean, historically, you look at any public figure now, like you're
00:05:37going to find, as you said, there's that dark and light.
00:05:39Those, and Mark's whole thing is those things go hand in hand.
00:05:43Like great CEOs oftentimes have some strong disagreeableness.
00:05:47They rate high on disagreeableness.
00:05:49They're conscientious, right?
00:05:52But they also are kind of high friction people.
00:05:55But some of the, like, you know, Mark and you're like, this is a good, but some really high
00:05:59achievers historically, even now, men, let's say that are really high achievers, they get
00:06:05a lot of things done and have accomplished a lot are also like from many people's accounts,
00:06:10like terrible people.
00:06:12You know, I guess the question is how close are those people to the actual person that
00:06:16are saying that?
00:06:17Yeah.
00:06:17I mean, I think right now there's a lot of hatred of billionaires.
00:06:19Sure.
00:06:20And look, I was born and raised in Silicon Valley.
00:06:22So going big is like a thing.
00:06:26Like you, my friends had gotten a skateboarding in the Bay area.
00:06:28Like they weren't thinking about becoming billionaires, but like the Embarcadero Plaza
00:06:32in the early nineties, those guys like started big companies.
00:06:34They went big, Rob Dyrdek, he's from, you know, Midwest, but then came out, he shows
00:06:39and then he's like ridiculous.
00:06:40I mean, I have no beef with him whatsoever.
00:06:42Going big is a theme in big, right?
00:06:45Yeah.
00:06:46And everyone uses these platforms and everyone hates these people.
00:06:49But I don't know, I'm, I know some of these people, I'm not like super close with them.
00:06:53Yeah.
00:06:54I like Mark.
00:06:55I trust Mark.
00:06:56I like the other Mark.
00:06:56I trust that Mark too.
00:06:59I don't, you know, various folks who run these big companies and do I think they're perfect?
00:07:04No.
00:07:04No, of course.
00:07:05But I could, listen, if I were to start talking about Nobel Prize winners past and present,
00:07:10man, the men and the women, very complicated people.
00:07:14Sure.
00:07:14Like you want to do a deep dive on the complications of science funding?
00:07:17Like look up Jonas Salk and who he married and getting money and then the work that he
00:07:21was able to do by virtue of his marital relations and things.
00:07:24I'm not saying he used his wife to make money.
00:07:25Married for funding?
00:07:27Many, there's many examples of this in science.
00:07:30You know, money fuels science.
00:07:31You can do more science with it.
00:07:32Gotta love some science.
00:07:33So there's a lot of interesting and it's not sorted.
00:07:36It's just sort of, it's, they're still humans.
00:07:39Yeah.
00:07:39You know, so anyway.
00:07:40But if you've got constant CCTV because there's a phone camera within two yards of you everywhere
00:07:45on the planet, those rough edges look a bit more harsh when they're scrutinized.
00:07:50Is that what you're saying?
00:07:52Yeah.
00:07:52I mean, I have this whole opinion, this purely opinion now about what cameras have done to
00:07:58sort of what we need in order to really make a strong assumption about somebody.
00:08:06So in the, like in the past you could just say, hey, this person, like I don't like them
00:08:09based on one thing they said.
00:08:10And you're entitled to do that.
00:08:12But I think two things have happened in the last couple of years that have completely
00:08:15transformed like what our expectation is about how rumor matches up with reality.
00:08:20At least for me.
00:08:21One would be, and this is an unfortunate, it's a bad incident, right?
00:08:26It would be the, you know, there was all this speculation about Diddy and these Diddy parties,
00:08:30right?
00:08:31And everyone expected like at some point there's going to be a video.
00:08:33Guess what?
00:08:34There was never actually a video aired, right?
00:08:36But there was a video of him beating up this woman.
00:08:39That sort of raised the threshold for what people need to see in order to be like, okay,
00:08:43that actually happened.
00:08:45Okay.
00:08:45The other one was this Coldplay concert thing.
00:08:48Like that Coldplay concert where the couple got caught cheating or whatever, like whatever
00:08:52the context of their backdrop or their relationship was totally uninteresting to me.
00:08:55But you could not have created, this was like opera, right?
00:08:59They're at a concert, they're cheating.
00:09:01The guy goes, oh, look at these two lovers, right?
00:09:03The guy is not just any guy.
00:09:05It's like a sketch from one of your shows.
00:09:07There's this moment where they're in the like, oh, that's us.
00:09:10Then there's this moment where they're like, oh shit.
00:09:14So it went from kind of like delight to shock to shame.
00:09:20And then, so we got to witness the whole arc.
00:09:22Now I wasn't interested in that, but the whole world jumped on that because it's like the
00:09:27human drama playing out in real time.
00:09:29So now when somebody goes, oh, I heard that this woman had a kid with this guy.
00:09:34I don't even know their names, but you guys probably do.
00:09:36You know, and she named her kid after this guy.
00:09:38And like, oh, it has this kind of low level, like whatever what happened between Justin
00:09:42Baldoni and Blake Lively and this and that.
00:09:44And it's sort of like, yeah, where's the video?
00:09:47Show me the video where this people don't, people then, so the press can go back and
00:09:51forth and back and forth and people kind of pick their camps.
00:09:54But I think real things being captured on real video has set the standard, like not standard,
00:09:59low standard, high threshold.
00:10:01And so I think that's changed.
00:10:03So now if somebody goes, oh yeah, these guys are sociopaths.
00:10:06You go, show me the data for sociopathic.
00:10:09People actually now need to see data.
00:10:11It's not sufficient that somebody write some little thing about one little thing.
00:10:15They need to see the video.
00:10:17The video is what actually shifts people's minds.
00:10:21So if people are saying, hey, this billionaire founder, this billionaire founder, this billionaire,
00:10:24these guys are terrible people.
00:10:26Right, right, right.
00:10:26How are they terrible people?
00:10:28Yeah.
00:10:28Show me them being terrible people.
00:10:30I want to see it, but I just don't see evidence of it.
00:10:32So I think it's just turning to chatter and I think it's just going to turn to fog.
00:10:36And then I think it's going to just go away.
00:10:37Well, yeah, I think a lot of it differs though.
00:10:39Depends who it is.
00:10:40There's different billionaires doing different stuff.
00:10:42So, but I agree.
00:10:42If someone just has a billion bucks, I wouldn't hate them just because it's like, you shouldn't
00:10:46have that much.
00:10:46Because you're busy and you're doing well.
00:10:48I think it's very easy to get upset with other people because it's a lot easier than like
00:10:52getting up and doing something.
00:10:54Like, retard maxing is hard.
00:10:55It is hard.
00:10:56That's a hundred percent true.
00:10:58Most people in their thirties are still training hard.
00:11:00Their protein is dialed in.
00:11:01They sleep better than they did in their twenties.
00:11:03Discipline is not the issue, but recovery feels somewhat different.
00:11:08Strength gains take a little longer.
00:11:10The margin for error starts to shrink.
00:11:13And that is why I'm such a huge fan of timeline.
00:11:15You see, mitochondria are the energy producers inside of your muscle cells.
00:11:19As they weaken with age, your ability to generate power and recover effectively changes.
00:11:24Even if your habits stay strong.
00:11:27Mitopure from timeline contains the only clinically validated form of urethralin A used in human
00:11:32trials.
00:11:33It promotes mitophagy, which is your body's natural process for clearing out damaged mitochondria
00:11:37and renewing healthy ones.
00:11:38In studies, this supported mitochondrial function and muscle strength in older adults.
00:11:43It's not about pushing harder to actually supporting the cellular machinery underneath
00:11:48your training.
00:11:48If you care about staying strong into your thirties, forties and fifties and beyond, this
00:11:53is foundational.
00:11:54Best of all, there is a 30 day money back guarantee plus free shipping in the US and
00:11:58they ship internationally.
00:11:59And right now you can get up to 20% off by going to the link in the description below
00:12:03or heading to timeline.com/modernwisdom and using the code modern wisdom at checkout.
00:12:08That's timeline.com/modernwisdom and modern wisdom at checkout.
00:12:13Congratulations.
00:12:14You made it to the end of a clip and the full length episode is available right here.

Key Takeaway

Prioritizing concrete action and execution over constant self-reflection and digital rumination is a more effective path to accomplishment, particularly as modern surveillance sets a higher evidentiary standard for judging character.

Highlights

  • Retardmaxxing prioritizes immediate action over introspection, reflecting a philosophy of ignoring unnecessary thought in favor of handling daily responsibilities.

  • Marc Andreessen, co-founder of Netscape and A16Z, popularizes the idea that great historical figures did not rely on constant self-reflection.

  • Constant digital surveillance via smartphone cameras has created a higher threshold of evidence required for the public to believe claims about a person's character.

  • Rumination on emotional problems without taking tangible action is counterproductive and contributes to the decline of individual progress.

  • Public figures are currently subject to intense scrutiny, yet much of the negative sentiment toward high-achieving individuals lacks verified data-driven evidence.

  • High-achieving individuals frequently exhibit strong personality traits, such as high disagreeableness and conscientiousness, which can be misconstrued as being difficult.

Timeline

Defining Retardmaxxing

  • Retardmaxxing encourages ignoring negative thoughts or minor issues to focus entirely on necessary tasks.
  • The concept suggests that excessive thinking and rumination prevent progress.
  • The approach mimics a basic, action-oriented philosophy rather than relying on self-analysis.

The term stems from internet culture and is associated with a specific, direct method of living that prioritizes 'doing' over 'thinking'. It is framed as an antidote to the modern tendency to over-analyze personal challenges or seek excessive therapy for daily hurdles.

The Shift from Introspection to Action

  • Marc Andreessen argues that high achievers throughout history did not sit around introspecting.
  • Dana White emphasizes getting to work and providing for one's family over publicly discussing emotional challenges.
  • Constant engagement with personal problems in online spaces creates a dangerous cycle of rumination.

The discussion challenges the current societal emphasis on constant emotional check-ins. While acknowledging the importance of mental health, it posits that excessive focus on feelings without corresponding action hinders potential and leads to stagnant behavior.

Public Figures and the Burden of Proof

  • High achievers often possess traits like high disagreeableness, which contributed to their historical success.
  • Modern smartphone cameras have increased the threshold of evidence required to confirm claims about a person's behavior.
  • Social media speculation often turns into 'fog' that lacks concrete data, making it difficult to judge character accurately.

The prevalence of cameras everywhere has changed how people judge public figures, requiring actual video evidence rather than rumor or hearsay. This increased scrutiny often unfairly characterizes strong, high-achieving personalities, while speculative negative sentiment remains largely unsubstantiated by real data.

Community Posts

No posts yet. Be the first to write about this video!

Write about this video