Transcript

00:00:00Today I'm going to talk to you about one of my very favorite topics, which is romantic love.
00:00:05I'm going to make the case that romantic love is one of the best ways that human beings find the
00:00:10meaning of their life. Romantic love has been something that's been a major feature of my own
00:00:16life. You know, I try to eat my own cooking when it comes to true love and happiness. And in this
00:00:21regard, it's really gone well for me. I feel very fortunate. We've just celebrated our 34th wedding
00:00:26anniversary. We have three adult kids. We have four grandsons. And our communication has marginally
00:00:32improved over those intervening decades. Now, why do I tell you all of this? It's not because that's
00:00:36so extraordinary, not from people my age. They all have a weird story like that. But here's the thing.
00:00:42It turns out that that kind of story is less and less normal today. We're finding that there are
00:00:48fewer of these tales of sort of entrepreneurial romantic derring-do. And what's up with that?
00:00:55Well, that's what I want to talk about.
00:00:57Hi, friends. Welcome to Office Hours. I'm Arthur Brooks. This is a show about love, meaning,
00:01:10and happiness, how you can find more of it using the big ideas in science,
00:01:14and how you can bring these ideas to other people as well. I'm a behavioral scientist dedicated to
00:01:19lifting people up and bringing them together using science and ideas. And I want you to have those
00:01:24ideas as well, because I'm not just a happiness teacher. I'm trying to be the leader of a movement
00:01:30of happiness teachers. And I need you in the movement with me. That's how we make a better
00:01:34world. Today, I'm going to talk to you about one of my very favorite topics, which is romantic love.
00:01:40I'm going to give a deep dive into the science of romantic love and how it's very, very important for
00:01:45finding the meaning of your life. Now, as always, if you have criticisms or ideas or questions for me,
00:01:51please do feedback. The email address is officehours@arthurbrooks.com, or put it in the
00:01:56comment section wherever you're viewing or listening to this podcast. As always, please like, subscribe,
00:02:02leave a review, and do stay in touch with all of us, because that's what we really care about is,
00:02:07once again, building this community. And that requires hearing from you.
00:02:11Well, back to the main topic today, which is love, specifically romantic love. I'm going to
00:02:18make the case that romantic love is one of the best ways that human beings find the meaning of
00:02:23their life. It's not the only way. In different episodes, I'll talk about other ways to find the
00:02:27meaning of your life. But as always, what I'm talking about here is a piece of this new book
00:02:34that I have on March 31st, 2026 called The Meaning of Your Life, Finding Purpose in an Age of Emptiness.
00:02:41Specifically, I'm going to be talking about a whole section of this book on romantic love and how this
00:02:44is the entry point. This is the first rung in the ladder toward finding the meaning of life. But of
00:02:51course, it's a hard one for a lot of people because romantic love is so mysterious. It seems so
00:02:57impossible to solve. Well, in point of fact, it is a problem that's impossible to solve. It's one that
00:03:03you only have to live with, that you have to understand quite intuitively. And I'm going to talk
00:03:08to you about exactly how to do that. I'm going to use science and ideas to talk to you about something
00:03:12that goes beyond science and ideas. That's the bottom line. And when you actually live in this
00:03:17particular way, including in the unpleasant parts of it, the breakups, the heartbreaks, the grief,
00:03:21you will find more meaning in your life. That's my promise to you today. Romantic love, that's
00:03:29our topic. Now, romantic love has been something that's been a major feature of my own life.
00:03:37You know, I try to eat my own cooking when it comes to love and happiness. And in this regard,
00:03:42it's really gone well for me. I feel very fortunate. When I was 24 years old, well,
00:03:48as those of you who know a little bit about my backstory, I was a professional classical musician
00:03:52in those days, all the way through my 20s. It was my gap decade, you might say. And I was playing
00:03:57on the road at one point in the summer of 1988. I was doing a concert tour, a chamber music concert
00:04:03tour with my quintet in the Burgundy region of France, playing classical music, chamber music
00:04:08concerts, different wineries, and, you know, at different schools and things, just a chamber
00:04:13music tour. And after one of the concerts that I was playing, I met a girl. I was 24 years, 25.
00:04:20I went up to her to talk to her because she, you know, smiled at me during a concert while I was
00:04:24playing. And that didn't happen all that often. And so I made a beeline for her to introduce myself.
00:04:29It turns out she didn't speak a single word of English, which is problematic because I didn't
00:04:33speak anything else except English. She spoke French, and Spanish, and Italian, and Catalan,
00:04:37among other things. And I learned through an interpreter, through a friend who was bilingual,
00:04:41that she actually wasn't French. She was studying in France as a music student herself, and she was
00:04:47from Barcelona, Spain. And so I did the only obvious thing, which you might think be to say, "Well,
00:04:54too bad. You know, maybe in another life, I'll actually be able to talk to you." I did what
00:05:00I should have done, which was I asked her out to dinner through an interpreter. And we went
00:05:03out to dinner and had a couple of dates. And then I went home from my tour, but I couldn't get her
00:05:07out of my head. So I called my dad and I said, "Dad, you know, I think I met the girl I'm going
00:05:13to marry." And he said, "Great, great. Can I meet her?" And I said, "Well, it's a little complicated.
00:05:20She doesn't speak a word of English. She doesn't live in the United States. And she has no idea
00:05:25that I feel this way." Which actually put some barriers in the way, but there are no barriers
00:05:28to a, you know, a red-blooded American 24-year-old. So I stayed in touch as best I could and set a plan
00:05:35to get to know her a little bit better. I didn't just set a plan. I set a strategy. I actually quit
00:05:40my job. I moved to Spain. There's a little bit between here and there. There was a year that
00:05:46went by during that. And she had actually come over to visit me in New York, and she had started
00:05:50studying English. So she took some initiative as well. But by the next summer, I had actually
00:05:55quit my job and taken a job in the Barcelona City Orchestra to try to, well, close that deal if it
00:06:01were possible. You know, learned how to communicate with each other a little bit. Took me about two
00:06:06years to close that deal, but indeed, we got married, just as I had hoped. And you might be
00:06:13wondering how the story turns out because that's kind of a quixotic tale, sort of like Don Quixote
00:06:18tilting at windmills. The music career wasn't long for the world. I moved on at age 31 to other
00:06:25things, but the marriage was a big success. We've just celebrated our 34th wedding anniversary.
00:06:30We have three adult kids. We have four grandsons. And our communication has marginally improved over
00:06:36those intervening decades. Now, why do I tell you all of this? It's not because that's so
00:06:41extraordinary, not from people my age. You talk to people in their 60s today, 50s, whatever,
00:06:46late boomers or Gen Xers, and they all have a weird story like that. But here's the thing. It turns out
00:06:53that that kind of story is less and less normal today. We're finding that there are fewer of these
00:06:59tales of sort of entrepreneurial, romantic, daring do. And what's up with that? Well, that's what I
00:07:06want to talk about. And I want to talk about how you can be more of an entrepreneur in your love life,
00:07:11even if you're 24 today, like I was back then. How you can think about your life as an enterprise.
00:07:18And the currency of that enterprise is love and happiness. Romantic love being the highest octane,
00:07:23kind of that fuel for your entrepreneurial journey, and how you can design your life by taking
00:07:29strategic risk in a way that perhaps the world has told you not to do. How the technology has
00:07:34discouraged you, but in point of fact, how you can get your life back, starting with the romance that
00:07:40you very likely want. So where do we start the story? We start the story with, well, how about a
00:07:47little bit of data? And I just made the assertion that that was more frequently the case, that we
00:07:52would have stories like this for people my age when they were in their 20s, compared to people who are
00:07:56in their 20s today. And that's not just an assertion. That's just not just an old guy saying, "Kids these
00:08:01days," you know, shaking my fist at the clouds or something. No, that's actually in the data is
00:08:06pretty clear. For example, and let's go back before my time in about 1950, 1949 to be exact, 79% of
00:08:13households in America contained a married couple. Today that's 47%. 79% to 47%. Something big has
00:08:20happened. You find that there's been not in a complete implosion, but a significant
00:08:26diminishment of the rate of people actually getting married. So you might think to yourself, "Well, yeah,
00:08:30well, sure. Thank you, professor, but people are living together without getting married." That's true,
00:08:35but it's not also true. You find that even cohabitation has fallen, especially over the last
00:08:42couple of decades. So since 1990, which is around the time that I met Mrs. B, specifically I met her in
00:08:501988, I got married in 1991, that the percentage of people unpartnered completely has risen among men
00:08:58by a third and among women by a quarter. Here's basically the way to think about it. Marriage is
00:09:04going down. Cohabitation is going down. People are even having less sex, not even hookups is what
00:09:09we're talking about here. In 1988, people in the 20s, about 50% at any given time had a sexual
00:09:16partner that was more or less regular. Today it's about 33%. So even that is falling. Okay, so I'm
00:09:22giving you all these data. Who cares? Well, I do because I think about love and happiness. Happiness,
00:09:28yeah, for sure. All this, less marriage, less being together, less romantic life, less romantic love
00:09:37is horrible for happiness. And it's a big part of, it's a symptom of, and it reinforces what we call
00:09:45in this show the psychogenic epidemic of unhappiness. Now, a psychogenic epidemic is an epidemic,
00:09:51meaning it's highly contagious. It's creating a lot of misery, but it doesn't have biological origin
00:09:56necessarily. Now, everything has some biological origin because as you all know, psychology is
00:10:01biology. But be that as it may, this is something that's really weird. It's not as if a virus or a
00:10:06bacteria has entered the population, has made people not fall in love, not be attracted to each other,
00:10:13not go out with each other. It's something psychogenic that's going on in our happiness
00:10:20that's related to the unwillingness or inability for people to actually find romantic love that so
00:10:25many people will confess that they want, but that just isn't there as much. Now, if in your own
00:10:33particular life, you do have a romantic love relationship, that's fantastic. I'm super happy
00:10:38for you, but you probably know somebody who doesn't. And if you don't, you probably or you might want
00:10:44one. And so let's demystify it a little bit. Let's talk a little bit more about the psychogenic
00:10:49epidemic because as we always do, let's use the science to understand our problem. And then let's
00:10:54actually get to some solutions. What I want to do today is to give you a protocol for actually
00:11:00understanding the experience of having real romantic love in your life. How do you get it?
00:11:06How do you keep it? You fall in love. How do you stay in love? Let's start off a little bit with
00:11:12a description of what happens to you when you are falling in love. And then that will give us an
00:11:17opportunity to talk about why it doesn't work right sometimes, why it might not have worked right in
00:11:22your life, why you've actually had the experience where you were falling in love and the other person
00:11:26wasn't or vice versa. This is a good way to understand, to demystify a lot of what seems
00:11:33like the most mysterious experience that we will ever face. And in point of fact, it sort of is.
00:11:37When we fall in love, there's kind of a four-step process that's happening in the human brain.
00:11:43The first step in the process is just basic attraction. And attraction is largely
00:11:48understood in the context of sex hormones, testosterone, estrogen.
00:11:53By the way, both men and women have testosterone. Both men and women have estrogen. You probably
00:11:59already know that. It's just that men have more testosterone than women and women have more
00:12:02estrogen than men. And there's a surge in the sex hormones when there's a basic attraction.
00:12:07That's not weird. That's not toxic. There's nothing wrong with that. That's the most
00:12:12normal thing ever. This is how we were evolved. This is a biological process. This is how
00:12:16homo sapiens actually identify each other as potential mates. That happens at the very
00:12:22beginning. That can happen as quickly as seeing somebody from across a room, as a matter of fact.
00:12:27But of course, it's much more intense when we're having a conversation with somebody who's
00:12:31attractive, which is why people want to go out on a date. They want to get to know each other.
00:12:34They want to see whether the attraction is real, which is to say they want to see whether or not
00:12:38there's an experience that they're having neurochemically, largely with the sex hormones,
00:12:42testosterone and estrogen. Now, this is very quickly followed by a second neurochemical step,
00:12:49which involves neurotransmitters, which get involved, specifically norepinephrine and dopamine.
00:12:55Now, you all know about dopamine. I've talked about it ad nauseum in the show about addiction and
00:13:00craving and desire and learning and wanting and escalation of particular behaviors and all that.
00:13:05But dopamine is just involved in so many types of behaviors. And indeed, it has a very big
00:13:11involvement in the process of falling in love, as does norepinephrine, which is a stress hormone
00:13:17produced in the adrenal glands sitting right above the kidneys. You say, "Wow, a stress hormone." Yeah.
00:13:22Well, if you've been in love before, you know it's unbelievably stressful, but it's unbelievably
00:13:25blissful as well. What is this actually doing to us? It's giving us a sense of anticipation and a
00:13:32sense of euphoria. So for example, you're falling in love with somebody or you just went on a really,
00:13:36really successful date or two with somebody, and you're saying, "I wonder if that person's
00:13:40going to text me." Well, the anticipation of the text is delicious and terrible at the same time.
00:13:48That's dopamine. That's dopamine that's actually in your brain saying, "Anticipation and reward.
00:13:52It's going to be great. If it happens, sure hope it happens." And then ding, and it's actually the
00:13:58person. And that's that little splash of euphoria as you actually hear from that person. That's
00:14:03norepinephrine. Now, all the things that I'm talking about here, this neurochemical cascade
00:14:07of falling in love... By the way, all of this, almost everything in neuroscience is not settled
00:14:12science. So it's not as if everything has been seen in the lab and there's no neuroscientist who
00:14:17disagrees with this. On the contrary, if you're a neuroscientist and you think this is too glib or
00:14:22something, let me know because I want to learn and we're all learning, we're actually getting better
00:14:26at this. But this is as close as I can get actually based on the refereed academic literature on this
00:14:32to try to turn it into language that ordinary people can understand with respect to the experience
00:14:38that they actually have. So that's step two, norepinephrine and dopamine that gives you
00:14:42anticipation of reward and a sense of euphoria. That happens relatively quickly, like within days
00:14:50of actually meeting somebody, sometimes even more quickly than that. And that's what makes you feel
00:14:55kind of addicted to the other person. And in point of fact, neuroscientists studying the brains of
00:14:59people in love versus those addicted to drugs find similar activity in the pleasure and pain regions
00:15:04of the brain. If you've been following the work all along, you know that I'm talking about the ventral
00:15:09tegmental area, the nucleus accumbens, the insula, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, et cetera,
00:15:14et cetera, all those parts of the brain that are involved in pleasure and pain, which you get when
00:15:18you're actually addicted to drugs or gambling or you get that when you're in love too. I mean, look
00:15:23at the activity of somebody falling in love. You'll be like, oh my goodness, this is a methamphetamine
00:15:29addict. Oh no, it's okay. It's just somebody who's in love. And that's the reason that you feel
00:15:33addicted to the other person when you're in the early stages of falling in love. Okay, that's step
00:15:37two. Step three is where it gets kind of gnarly here, I have to tell you, because that's where we
00:15:41get a big drop in serotonin. Now, serotonin is a neurotransmitter that's implicated in the process
00:15:49of people experiencing clinical depression. Major depressive disorders, generally speaking, involves
00:15:56a big, big deficit in the synapse of serotonin. That's the reason that people who seek relief from
00:16:02their depression symptoms will take selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, so-called SSRIs.
00:16:07Prozac, for example, is the most famous variant of a whole family of these drugs to keep more serotonin
00:16:14in the synapse, which is associated with lower symptoms of depression. Well, guess what happens
00:16:19when you're falling in love in this third stage? Your serotonin tanks. Now, here's the interesting
00:16:24thing about this. And once again, all this stuff is contested, but this is really... I think this
00:16:30is an unbelievably useful way to understand what's going on here. You ruminate in sadness when you're
00:16:36depressed. You ruminate on another person when you're falling in love. Well, rumination is
00:16:43rumination. Rumination comes from ruminare, which is Latin for chewing the cud. That's what rumination
00:16:50is all about. So you can't get sadness and regret out of your brain if you're clinically depressed,
00:16:55feeling so crummy about yourself. You can't get that other person out of your brain. You're
00:16:58thinking and thinking and thinking about every little thing. And did I say the right thing?
00:17:02Was that a stupid thing that I said? And that little gesture that she did, does that mean that
00:17:06she doesn't like me? Does it mean she does like me? What does that mean? Well, that's the same kind of
00:17:10activity because your brain is working the same way. What's happening with rumination? You're
00:17:14imprinting something. When you're really depressed about something, your brain is literally trying to
00:17:20learn a lesson so that you won't make a mistake a second time. It can be really out of proportion.
00:17:25It can be really exaggerated, which is the reason that relief is so important and drugs for some
00:17:31people can provide some relief. But when you're falling in love, you want that other person to
00:17:35imprint on you because you're in the process of becoming pair bond mated with that person.
00:17:39I mean, you're potentially, this is it for life, man. So you better imprint in the right way,
00:17:44but it leads to all this kind of weird kind of ruminative, obsessive activity. Like, why did I
00:17:51just leave 10 voicemails in the last hour? Maybe I'm dating myself, you know, who leaves 10 voicemails
00:17:57now? Why did I send 100 text messages in the last hour? I'm so stupid, stupid, stupid. That's classic.
00:18:03That's classic for ruminating, low serotonin. So really, I mean, technically you should be able
00:18:10to look at somebody's brain and say, wow, really low serotonin activity, either they're clinically
00:18:15depressed or they're in the third stage of falling in love. Okay. That's one of the reasons that
00:18:20falling in love is a thrill and wonderful, but at the same time, really terrible. And you wouldn't
00:18:25want to stay in that stage for the rest of your life. You know, people would say, I just wish I could
00:18:29be in love like the early days with my spouse for the rest of my life. Are you kidding me?
00:18:34You'd need to be medicated if that were the case. So you could function at all, most likely,
00:18:39especially because of this third step. And last but not least, this is where we're trying to get
00:18:44in the weeks and months after falling in love. This last step involves oxytocin and to a lesser
00:18:51extent, vasopressin. These are neuropeptides in the brain that function as hormones in the brain
00:18:56that bond us together. Now, women have about three times as much oxytocin as men. And part of the
00:19:02reason for that is that women bear children and they need to bond to a brand new baby who doesn't
00:19:07have the slightest idea who even they are to the baby. And men also bond to the baby too, especially
00:19:13with eye contact and touch, which is why when your newborn baby is born, the guys, if you're going to
00:19:18be a dad and the doctor says, you want to cut the cord, say yes. And they hand you a kind of a messy
00:19:24baby, say yes, because you want to bond to the baby. That's really, really important. And it's
00:19:29a very beautiful thing. By the way, people when they have a newborn baby, it's like the 4th of July
00:19:34inside their head and they don't know what's going on. It's an unbelievable explosion of oxytocin.
00:19:38You also get a lot of oxytocin when you're in the process of falling in love with somebody,
00:19:42especially in this stage where you're bonding to the person. You're making somebody who you're
00:19:48not related to your kin. You know, I've talked in the past about the four pillars of happiness,
00:19:54the four habits of happiness that people engage in, faith, family, friendship, and work. Well,
00:20:00friendship and family. There's only one thing that falls into both categories and that's your spouse.
00:20:05That's your lifelong romantic partner. That person becomes another you in a very real way,
00:20:12but not related to you. Not supposed to be related to you. It's a taboo if they're related to you,
00:20:16but they become related to you in a way that really, really matters, which is that you're
00:20:19neurochemically linked in a pair bond that's supposed to last for life. Of course, it doesn't
00:20:25always last for life, but at least at the early stages, nobody's like, "Yeah, man. Oh, man. Oh,
00:20:30man. I want this to last for life, but I probably won't." That's not what people say, right? And the
00:20:35reason they don't say that is because they got the oxytocin pump on. Vasopressin, which is more
00:20:41prominent in males, by the way. That's less of the love link and it's more about loyalty and defense.
00:20:49So that's the reason that males have that a little bit more than females, as you'd imagine from the
00:20:54evolutionary biology. But the bottom line is men and women, they both get both and they're both
00:20:59really, really important such that the person that you're with is your mate forever. Human beings as a
00:21:05general rule, there's a lot of debate about this. Are we naturally monogamous? Are we serially
00:21:10monogamous? Are we non-monogamous? And there's no consensus on this except that if there is,
00:21:17it's that ideally almost everybody wants to be single unilaterally parabond mated. That's what
00:21:23people want. That's the ideal that people want. And so some would say that that's sort of the natural
00:21:27habitat for us. Doesn't always work out that way, of course, but that's the case. And that's certainly
00:21:32how you feel when you're falling in love. "This is it, man. This is going to be it for life." Or at
00:21:36least I sure hope it's going to be it for life. Now, the goal at this point is not the passionate
00:21:43love of steps one, two, and three. The goal is to get there together at the same time to the
00:21:50oxytocin level, the vasopressin level for deep connection and deep friendship. And this really
00:21:55is the goal of a successful pair bond mate. I mean, there's plenty of passion in 30, 40, 50 years,
00:22:06but it's deep friendship. That's the secret to a pair bond mate that lasts forever is deep
00:22:14friendship. That's what it's all about. And that has to do with this neurochemical bond where this
00:22:19person is your kin and is going to be your kin for the rest of your days. And when it doesn't happen,
00:22:25by the way, when you get the early stages, but not those late stages of kinship, that's when you get
00:22:31this deep, deep, deep disappointment. And that's one of the reasons that people can be just like
00:22:34madly in love. And then it doesn't work out. And a year later, they hate each other. What's up with
00:22:40that? And the answer is they didn't get to the friendship stage. The friendship stage has a
00:22:46particular coinage in the world of social science called companionate love. So there's passionate
00:22:52love, which are the early stages, there's companionate love, which is where you want to get.
00:22:56Again, plenty of passion in companionate love, but you want your companion. You want the person
00:23:00that you're walking into the sunset with, holding hands, the person you're going to be looking at as
00:23:05your closest friend, the person who is the other you as you take your dying breath. That's what really
00:23:09we're talking about with companionate love. I know it doesn't sound that thrilling. As my kids said,
00:23:14companionate love, dad, that's not hot. I mean, I get it. But that's just the term. And that's what
00:23:20we're talking about. When people actually don't get there, the disappointment from that can actually
00:23:23lead to real bitterness toward each other, as a matter of fact. Almost always the process is
00:23:29truncated, which is why there's so much bitterness in relationships that they don't work out. Now,
00:23:34why don't they work out? Frequently, it's because this neurochemical cascade that proceeds through
00:23:39very distinctive stages, people do it out of sync. They're not going through it at the same speed.
00:23:46So you can see how that's a problem, or that somebody doesn't go through the whole thing.
00:23:50And there's a real pathology with a lot of men. And again, this is a hypothesis. You can't really test
00:23:55this directly. But it's a pretty sound hypothesis nonetheless, that some guys, they can't get through
00:24:01all four stages. They can only go from sex hormones for attraction to thrill, right? One, two, stop.
00:24:09One, two, one, two. You've met guys like this, probably. Some women, but it's really quite common
00:24:15with guys. And these are a lot of guys who tend to be dark triads, by the way. And you know what
00:24:19that is. If you've watched the show for any length of time, I'll put a link here to the episode on how
00:24:25to spot a dark triad. And they tend to go... They're really attracted and they get a thrill, but they
00:24:30stop there because they don't fall in love. And so it's one, two, one, two, one, two. It's all about
00:24:35seduction. These are the worst guys that women typically get involved in, as a matter of fact.
00:24:41They just can't get through the whole neurochemical cascade all the way to a loving, committed
00:24:47relationship, which by its nature is companion at love with tons of oxytocin is how that works.
00:24:54So that's the way to understand how all this works. But it's also, it shows that when, for example,
00:24:59somebody tends to go through this really, really fast, they can scare other people off. And there is
00:25:04a phenomenon called hemophilia. I don't mean hemophilia. It's a blood disorder without the H.
00:25:10Hemophilia is a syndrome in which people fall in love almost instantaneously. And it tends to be
00:25:16more common in women than it is for men. And so women who fall in love really, really, really
00:25:21quickly, they often have problems because they're going like lickety split through this neurochemical
00:25:26cascade and guys can't keep up and the guys get scared off. So I would say that one problem is
00:25:33guys who don't get through the whole cascade and women who go too quickly through the cascade. But
00:25:37these are common problems that we see. And especially in the second case, if you're
00:25:41hemophilic, if you go too quickly, knowledge is power. This is not some sort of deterministic
00:25:47path where you're going to be stuck on this for the rest of your life. On the contrary,
00:25:50once you know this, the knowledge can actually help you slow this down and metacognitively,
00:25:56in other words, using your executive centers, decide on how you're going to behave,
00:26:00saying, "Okay, yeah, yeah, I'm doing that thing. I'm doing that thing. I'm feeling that thing,
00:26:05but I'm not going to do that thing, notwithstanding my feelings." And once again, how do you manage
00:26:09your feelings so they don't manage you? Go back to the episode on managing your emotions. And that's
00:26:14what you'll be able to use if you tend to be quite an hemophilic person. Hemophilic people are so
00:26:19emotive, they're so empathetic, they're so lovely, but they suffer. They suffer. And if that's you,
00:26:25then figure out ways to manage yourself. Go back to that episode and you'll see ways to actually
00:26:30do that. Okay, so there's lots of unbelievably useful information in this little primer on the
00:26:36neurobiology of falling in love, to be sure. But it's not just about neurobiology. Most religious
00:26:42traditions believe that there's a kind of a mystical sense in romantic love. I mean, in
00:26:48Hinduism, in the Bhagavad Purana, the authors elegize earthly love in the deity of Lord Krishna
00:26:58as a symbol of divine love. In other words, there's something divine about earthly love.
00:27:02It's a simulacrum. It's a model in the Hindu religion. It's a beautiful thing.
00:27:06In the Jewish and Christian Bible, "This is now the bone of my bones, the flesh of my flesh," said
00:27:12Adam about Eve. And you often think that it's like we become one flesh as kind of a reference to sex,
00:27:19but you know, it's one brain, man. And again, all the work that I've done talking about the
00:27:25hemispheric lateralization, the right hemisphere of the brain, this is really where communication
00:27:31happens between two people who are falling in love. And you know, after 34 years, I'm in love
00:27:35with my wife. I just am. And how do we communicate? We communicate beyond the level of just words. I
00:27:43mean, our language centers are in the left side of our brain, the Broca's area, and the Wernicke's
00:27:47area, and the left cortex. No, we're one pulsing right hemisphere, especially when things are
00:27:54working well. But even when they're not, even when we're fighting a lot, it's like, "Why are you so
00:27:59mad at me?" "I don't know." That's classic case of one flesh right there. Celebrate it. I mean, it's
00:28:06probably sometimes, but the whole point is that's the way it's supposed to work. That's the divine
00:28:11sense of what it is. Now, you might say like Brooks is such a romantic. "No, no, no, I'm a scientist.
00:28:16I'm both." Because when it comes to love, iron sharpens iron. The romance and the science,
00:28:23boy, did they ever meet up. This is also one of the reasons, by the way, when we get into the
00:28:26divinity of this thing, that people who regularly practice their religions, they have so much more
00:28:33success, generally speaking, in their relationships than those who don't. Now, again, I'm not saying
00:28:38that if you're not religious, you can't have success. I'm just saying that the odds go up
00:28:41if you do. Way lower divorce rates, way lower disillusion rates, and much, much higher levels
00:28:46of marital satisfaction. And Brad Wilcox, the University of Virginia, the Institute for Family
00:28:50Studies also shows that married couples, happily married couples who are religious, they tend to
00:28:56have a lot more sex than married couples who are not religious, which probably for secular couples
00:29:02sounds pretty surprising or it might, I don't know. Why is this? Because romantic love for really
00:29:09devout people in almost every religion, it's a manifestation of the divine. It's almost as if
00:29:16your marriage, your relationship, is an antenna to God. It's the craziest thing. And some of you
00:29:22watching will know what I'm talking about and some will be really baffled by this. But long married
00:29:27couples that have a strong religious faith, my faith or sort of any faith, they feel it's kind
00:29:32of like those old nuclear submarines where you'd have to have the first and second officers have
00:29:39a key to launch nuclear missiles. You have two keys in different parts of the sub, turn them both on,
00:29:45and then you can launch the missile. That's kind of how it feels like to have a connection to God,
00:29:50you need to have both keys turning is how that feels. And there's this really strong sense for
00:29:54a lot of religious couples that when I deny my spouse love, I'm denying her God's love.
00:30:00And again, if you're not religious, you're going, "That's crazy." But those of you who are
00:30:06religious, you'll know what I'm talking about. Einstein himself, by the way, who was not a
00:30:10traditional religious believer, but he was actually quite spiritual, the master theoretician of the
00:30:15universe's ultimate forces, he believed that it was love, romantic love, not science. That was how we
00:30:22would understand the meaning of the world and our place in it. The guy who invented the theory of
00:30:26relativity didn't say that these equations are going to help us understand the world and our place in
00:30:32it. It's romantic love, which was beyond his ability to articulate meaningfully. Okay. So what
00:30:39is it? What is love? What is love? You know, I should have defined it from the very beginning,
00:30:43but it gets back to good old Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas and Averroes and Maimonides and a lot of
00:30:50people in between would have defined love as to will the good of the other. Okay. So this might sound
00:30:57like I'm kind of getting off base here because I'm talking about a lot of sentiments, a lot of
00:31:01emotions, a lot of brain activity, and now I'm talking about the will, right? That the love is
00:31:06the will to go to the other as other. But that is actually the definition of what it means to be
00:31:12pair bonded with somebody. You know, if love, even romantic love, were just about a feeling,
00:31:18well, a feeling is evidence of love. It isn't love itself. The feeling of love is evidence of love,
00:31:24just like the smell of the turkey is evidence of Thanksgiving dinner, kind of like happiness,
00:31:28kind of works the same way. Happiness is not a feeling. Feelings are evidence of happiness. Well,
00:31:32the feeling of love is evidence of love. So love is an act of will and a commitment toward another
00:31:38person's good. They're good as them, is the way that that turns out. If love were just a feeling,
00:31:44man, I wouldn't have been married 34 years. I wouldn't have been married 34 minutes because
00:31:47that's probably when he had our first big argument. I mean, my wife is Spanish. Fighting is like a
00:31:54basic form of communication for them. So, yeah. So what is it? It's the will to go to the other.
00:32:00The trouble is that we don't have good vocabulary for it, especially in English.
00:32:04I mean, the fact that we got one word for love is pathetic, I have to say in English. You can love
00:32:10your wife. You can love your husband. You can love your dog. You can love your job. You can love the
00:32:15Red Sox. You can love Chicago deep dish pizza. But if you're loving all those things in the same way,
00:32:20well, there's some problems here. We need to talk. Obviously, you don't love everything in the same
00:32:25way. And we have a diminished vocabulary for the thing that we most want, at least most of us most
00:32:32want. Now, Spanish, which is my other language at this point, because Mrs. B and I, we kind of
00:32:36grew up together. And so we now speak a melange, a 50/50 melange of Spanish and English, a Spanglish,
00:32:42you might say. Spanish is marginally better for talking about love. It has two words that really
00:32:48mean that, kerer and amar. Amar is sort of deep passionate romantic love. Kerer is... It really
00:32:54means to love another person, to be sure, but you wouldn't use them interchangeably. You wouldn't say
00:33:00te amo to your sister. You wouldn't say that. You'd say te quiero, because I love you as a person,
00:33:07if that's how you express yourself, your sister. And that wouldn't be weird. So, differences, right?
00:33:13You know who got it right was the ancient Greeks. And I wish I could speak authoritatively about,
00:33:17I don't know, Sanskrit or the Dravidian languages of Southern India, which are so unbelievably rich
00:33:24in deep, deep psychology. I bet that they have great vocabularies in it, but I can't speak to
00:33:29that with any sort of authority. But Greek is unbelievable. There's seven words for love. Eros,
00:33:35which is romantic passionate love. Philia, which is brotherly love, or friendship, deep friendship.
00:33:42Agape, which is unconditional selfless love, including for the divine. Storga, which is between
00:33:50family members. Ludus, which is playful love or flirtation, which can lead to eros. Pragma,
00:33:57which means practical love and companionship. And philautia, which is self-love. And of course,
00:34:02all those things are really, really different, and they have a different verb for it, a different word
00:34:06for it in Greek for each one of those things. And this is really interesting, because it turns out
00:34:12that that's not just intellectual stuff. On the contrary, if we had a better understanding or a
00:34:16better vocabulary for different forms of love in English, we would be able to explain, for example,
00:34:21the friend zone, the dreaded friend zone. Sounds so nice, doesn't it? It's not nice, right? That's
00:34:26where two people are together and who could conceivably be fall in love, eros, mutually,
00:34:32but they don't. One has eros and the other has philia. One has passionate romantic love for the
00:34:40other and the other has friendship love. And that's just, it's sad for the one who, you know, philia
00:34:46is great. I love, I have tons of friends. I'm really glad they have philia for me, but I wouldn't
00:34:50want my wife to have philia for me. I mean, she does at this point because we have a deep kind of
00:34:54enduring love. On the contrary, we have all seven. That's what a long relationship is all about. But
00:35:00eros is the bedrock of it because we're husband and wife. This explains the mismatches that actually
00:35:06lead to heartbreak, as a matter of fact. Okay. Now, speaking of the Greeks, the reason I wanted
00:35:11to bring up the Greeks really is that the Greeks are the ones who help us understand this link
00:35:18between romantic love and the meaning of life and the meaning of life. And here's how it works.
00:35:23In Plato's symposium, which for those of you who haven't read it, Plato's symposium
00:35:28is really what it's doing. It's kind of, it's describing the words of Socrates. Socrates was
00:35:32Plato's teacher, but Socrates never wrote anything. So everything we know about Socrates's words
00:35:37actually comes from Plato. And so we don't know. I mean, did Socrates really say it? Was he taking
00:35:43dictation? Was he kind of working from memory? Probably working from memory. But the whole point
00:35:49is that in Plato's symposium, he tells the story of Socrates. When Socrates was recounting a time
00:35:55in his own youth, that he went to a prophetess named Deotima of Mantinea. Deotima of Mantinea,
00:36:02this prophetess, this really wise woman, and he asked her about love. How does love work? And
00:36:08it's this young guy and he wants to fall in love. He's really romantic and the whole thing. He says,
00:36:12"How does it work? How does it work, prophetess?" And Deotima of Mantinea talks to him about,
00:36:17describes to him what's called the ladder of love. Okay. Now, the ladder of love is something you can
00:36:22Google it if you want. In my new book, "The Meaning of Your Life," you'll get a bunch of stuff on the
00:36:27ladder of love. So I think it's awesome. And by the way, read the symposium on Plato if you haven't
00:36:32done that, because that's actually a really, really good use of your time, that talks about how
00:36:37romantic love leads to the deep meaning of life. It's the entry point. I'm not saying that falling
00:36:44in love instantaneously gives you the meaning of life. Here's how it works. The first rung of the
00:36:49ladder for most young people, most young adults who are most eager to fall in love, although don't
00:36:54get me wrong, I've met people in their 80s who fall madly head over heels in love. We're made to love
00:37:00because we're not supposed to be alone. Most of us aren't at least. That the first rung of the ladder
00:37:05is physical attraction to a single beautiful person. And by a single beautiful person, I don't
00:37:10mean who's objectively Madison Avenue on an ad beautiful. I'm talking about who in all the ways
00:37:18in their soul, their heart, and the way that they look to you in your eyes is a beautiful person.
00:37:25And your physical attraction to that person for all the things about them that make them who they
00:37:31are, that you have this, when I say physical attraction, that means you've got the attraction.
00:37:35And I described the neurobiological origins of attraction. You know how this works. That first
00:37:41feeling that you have is not, you're not an animal. You're not a dog. You're a human that's being
00:37:47initiated in the rights of deep philosophical meaning of what it means to be a human.
00:37:53That's really what Diotima of Mantinea was telling Socrates. Why? Because that is the first rung of
00:38:00the ladder, the second of which you need the first to get to the second. And the second is the love
00:38:06of the actual soul. So first you have the admiration of somebody's physical beauty, and then you have
00:38:12the love of their soul. So there was the initiation that brought you in contact with somebody, and then
00:38:19you can actually go deeper with the person. From that, only when you have a love of somebody's soul
00:38:24do you have an appreciation for something good that's not you. See how that works? It's like,
00:38:31so it's not all about me, me, me, me, me. And I have a, I know a bunch of grandsons at this point.
00:38:35And they're awesome. They're great, but they're littler, teeny tiny, they're babies. And like the
00:38:40most egotistical people in the world are babies. They kind of have to be to stay alive. Part of
00:38:45what it means to grow up and to become even an adult is to realize deeply in your soul,
00:38:52realize that as you looking out at a world of other beautiful things and beautiful people,
00:38:58the way that's initiated is by saying, wow, she's so stunning. And then to say, and she's got a
00:39:04gorgeous soul. And only when you appreciate the depth and beauty of somebody else's soul can you
00:39:09appreciate the depth and beauty of all of the good things in society that are not you. That's rung
00:39:16number three. From there, it's not just good things in society. Then you can go to the abstract and
00:39:22have a, and develop according to Socrates, a love of ideas of abstract concepts, that the love for
00:39:28things that are not you doesn't have to be limited to people and stuff. It's abstract ideas, which
00:39:34isn't easy. It requires maturity. It requires experience to be sure, but only from there,
00:39:40from the love of actual beautiful ideas, can you move to the love of what is most beautiful and
00:39:45what's actually meaningful in life. You can understand the meaning of your own life.
00:39:49That's the ladder of love that actually starts by looking at somebody across the,
00:39:55down the church pew or across the bar or in class and go, man, what a knockout. And then
00:40:03yada, yada, yada, as they used to say in Seinfeld, you know, four or five steps later,
00:40:07maybe a couple of decades later, you understand the meaning of your life, but you got to start
00:40:10somewhere. That's what Socrates' point. But that's one of the reasons that I find in my own research
00:40:16that people always say, how do I know the meaning of the life? And I would just spontaneously start
00:40:19talking about the love of their life, their soulmate, is how that actually works. So how do
00:40:25you do it? How do you initiate appropriately the neurochemical cascade, one that proceeds in an
00:40:32orderly fashion, more or less than the same speed that leads to companion that love can allow you to
00:40:39climb the ladder of love toward the meaning of your life? How do you solve the love depression
00:40:44that I talked about in the very beginning, looking at the data in your own life?
00:40:48Now, to begin with, to do this requires risk, taking risk. One of the characteristics that I
00:40:57find that's actually inhibiting falling in love the most, and this once again gets back to the
00:41:02literature that I look at every single day and what I write about, is that younger people,
00:41:07believe it or not, are actually less risk-taking than people were when they were young who are now
00:41:13my age. And this gets a lot to the work of Jean Twenge, a wonderful social psychologist at San
00:41:18Diego State University, who talks about how young adults are growing up much more slowly,
00:41:24and the way that she measures that is with risk-taking behavior. Now, some of it's pretty
00:41:28innocuous and healthy, like driving. Some of it's less healthy, like drinking and using drugs,
00:41:35which everybody says, "Oh, young people, they're drinking and taking drugs more than ever." No,
00:41:39wrong. A lot less, as a matter of fact. They're also less likely to fall in love. They're also
00:41:43less likely to have sex, and it has everything to do, she says, of a lower willingness to take
00:41:49personal risk. Now, risk is funny because there's bad risks and there's good risks, but risk in
00:41:56general is not an unhealthy thing. On the contrary, that's characteristic of being an entrepreneur
00:42:01with your life. And I don't recommend being an entrepreneur with your life by taking dangerous
00:42:05drugs and driving 100 miles an hour. That's stupid. But risks with your heart, another matter. That's
00:42:12the most entrepreneurial thing that you can do. Years ago, not that many years ago, I was giving
00:42:16a speech on Capitol Hill for a bunch of Capitol Hill staffers, people in their 20s. Now, for a
00:42:21little bit of background, Washington DC is the world's most dysfunctional dating market. I mean,
00:42:26it's everybody's climbing, and it's all about power, and it's just not a healthy way for people
00:42:31to fall in love, I have found. And so they were really deeply interested when I was talking about
00:42:37this topic. And I said, "Look, if you really want to be an entrepreneur, real entrepreneur with your
00:42:40life, give your heart away. Take a risk." That's the ultimate risk of putting at risk valuable
00:42:47resources in search of explosive returns. That's the definition of entrepreneurship.
00:42:51I thought it was clever anyway. A couple of weeks later, a guy comes up to me on a plane,
00:42:55because I'm always on a plane. And he says, "Professor Brooks." I said, "Yeah." He says,
00:43:00"I was at that talk you got on Capitol Hill about being an entrepreneur with my life,
00:43:04and to get my heart away and take a risk." And I said, "Yeah." He says, "And I can't get it out
00:43:07of my head." I said, "Yeah." He said, "So I'm on my way right now to tell a woman I've been secretly in
00:43:13love with for two years how I feel. I'm going to spill it." And I'm like, "Dude, it was only
00:43:21a speech. I'm not trying to ruin your life." I was kind of worried about that because I'm thinking,
00:43:26"Yeah, I mean, this could have consequences." And I said, "Here's my email. Let me know how it turns
00:43:32out." He said, "Okay." And I didn't hear from him, which seemed like not great. Well, I did see him
00:43:40some months later at a holiday party at the company that I was running, and he showed up. And he said,
00:43:46"Remember me?" And I said, "Yeah." And I said, "How did it go? How did it go with that woman
00:43:52that you were in love with?" And he said, "She shot me down. She wasn't in love with me. Not at all.
00:43:56She was in love with another guy. She introduced me to him. It was horrible." And I was very contrite.
00:44:02I said, "I'm sorry. I wasn't trying to ruin your life." And he said, "No, no, no, no." He said,
00:44:05"The reason I came is because I wanted to thank you." I said, "Thank me? For what?" And he said,
00:44:12"Because, you know, that was the thing I was most afraid of in my life. I mean, I just couldn't...
00:44:18I couldn't bear the thought of that happening. And it did. And I didn't die. And I'm not afraid
00:44:25anymore." You get the point, right? This makes you stronger. Now, to be sure, it is unbelievably
00:44:34painful to be rejected. I have studied the pain of social rejection. The dorsal anterior cingulate
00:44:40cortex of the brain is designed in the limbic system to make you hate social rejection. Even in
00:44:47little games when they put people in machines to look at the activities of their brains,
00:44:50and they simulate rejection by having a ball-tossing game that you're looking at on a screen, and two
00:44:57other people start excluding you from the game, it starts to feel painful in this dorsal anterior
00:45:02cingulate cortex of your brain. Imagine when somebody says to you, "You love me, but I don't
00:45:07love you." It's going to be unbelievably painful. It's intensely painful, as a matter of fact. And
00:45:14I've talked about this kind of pain in past episodes in the past. But here's the thing.
00:45:18That's how you learn. That's the only way that you learn. What do you learn? You learn about what went
00:45:24wrong. You learn that you won't die. You learn more what you're looking for. You learn that that wasn't
00:45:32the person for you, and why. That's why it's so critically important to get into the cycle of try,
00:45:37fail, suffer, try, try again. Now, I've got a lot of data on how long it actually takes
00:45:47for people to get over their heartbreak. And the answer is usually a few months, not a few years.
00:45:53It's very unusual that you have a breakup, and it lasts years and years. On the contrary, you will
00:45:57actually get over it sooner than you think. And six weeks from now, you'll be on a date with somebody
00:46:01else going, "I can't believe I love that loser so much." That's the typical thing that we actually
00:46:06find. But also, the learning that you get is really the big, big benefit from this. There's a really
00:46:12interesting paper on this, a 2018 study that looked at 160 daters who were in their 20s.
00:46:18And then they broke up around the age of 22, which is kind of the modal age to have your first big
00:46:24breakup of somebody that you're truly in love with, it turns out. And then ask them what they learned.
00:46:30And it turns out that those who actually believe they learned from their breakup, they had much
00:46:35higher relationship satisfaction subsequently and lower relationship conflict in their next
00:46:41relationship. In other words, learn, learn, learn, do the postmortem, figure out what actually went
00:46:46wrong, and you will benefit from this. But you have to fail as part of the process here so that you can
00:46:53get better. That means take a risk and be willing to fail. What do they learn, by the way? They learn
00:46:58three things. Here's what breakups teach you. Social cognitive maturity, right? That's like,
00:47:04"I know why I behaved like an idiot, and I won't do that again because I matured." Number two is
00:47:09romantic agency. "I know what I want now." And number three is coherence. You all know what that
00:47:15is because you've been following the show. That means why things happen the way they do. "I know
00:47:19why my last relationship failed, and I'm going to fix those mistakes in the future." You only get
00:47:24that from experience. This is why people, they tend to do best in marriages, for example, after
00:47:31they've had a few breakups. Not 50 breakups, not 200 breakups. We're talking about a few breakups.
00:47:38It's kind of like a mature startup is the way that that works. A couple of false starts along the way.
00:47:43Mature startups, not mergers. Certainly not hostile takeovers. Anyway, I'm not going to press that
00:47:50metaphor. All right. That's number one. Take more risk. That's the first of the protocols of how to
00:47:58fall in love and stay in love. Number two, don't look for your body double. Look for your compliment.
00:48:06This is really important. Now, I'm really interested in how technology is affecting how people
00:48:14fall in love and stay in love. 62% of long-term relationships now are starting on the apps.
00:48:20That's kind of how people meet. I talk to young people, and I say, "Why don't you just go up when
00:48:23you're having a drink after work? Go up and talk to somebody," because they're like, "Because I don't
00:48:27want them to think I'm a serial killer." Yeah. I mean, society is very complicated, and how people
00:48:33meet actually changes. I've got a lot of thoughts on that. It's very important, if you can, to meet
00:48:38people in real life. Usually, that's actually not in a bar. That's around common interests,
00:48:43whether it's a running club or church or whatever your thing actually happens to be. But probably,
00:48:48for those of you who are watching this and you're in the dating pool, you're probably using the apps
00:48:52because most people aren't. What should you be looking for? The answer is not somebody who's
00:48:57exactly like you. One of the problems with many of the apps, the apps are getting better at this,
00:49:01and I'm very bullish on what the apps are going to be able to do. I'm not anti-technology.
00:49:05But what they've often done in the past is allowed you to curate your dating profile to
00:49:10eliminate everybody who doesn't have a lot of overlap with you beyond just some basic values.
00:49:17We vote the same way. We listen to the same music. We want to go live in the same city. We work in the
00:49:22same industry, everything. And pretty soon, you're looking in the mirror, and that is truly not hot.
00:49:29I hope that's not hot to you. Why is it that more and more people often say, who curate their dating
00:49:36profiles very, very studiously and in a very careful way, that they get a lot of dates but
00:49:42they don't have much attraction? And the answer is because there's too much compatibility and not
00:49:46enough complementarity. Complementarity is difference, and difference is hot. That's really where it comes
00:49:51down to. And again, this is a neurobiological phenomenon. Famous study. Many of you have heard
00:49:57about this. This is the Wedekind et al study in biological sciences, an old study, 1995.
00:50:03This is the famous T-shirt sniffing study. And what it was was, in a nutshell really quickly, is that
00:50:10guys on the college campus, these experiments always use undergraduate dudes because
00:50:16they'll do anything for 20 bucks. They had to wear a T-shirt around for 48 hours, working out, going to
00:50:22class, no showers. And then they would take those T-shirts and put them in shoeboxes and drill holes
00:50:26in the shoeboxes. And undergraduate women who didn't know them, or they didn't know who they were, there's
00:50:31no identifying characteristics in the boxes, had to sniff, I know it's gross, bear with me, sniff the
00:50:37T-shirts and say who's most attractive simply on the basis of the smell. What do they find?
00:50:42That those who are immunologically most dissimilar from them, the women, were most attractive to them.
00:50:49Now there's a reason for this. This is called the MHC, the major histocompatibility complex.
00:50:53You know, based on smell, you don't know. It's an indication to you because your brain
00:51:00knows so much more than you're consciously aware of. Who is dissimilar enough from you such that if you
00:51:05hypothetically have offspring, who's going to have a wider immunological repertoire? You want people who
00:51:11have different defenses than you. That's what the major histocompatibility complex actually is,
00:51:17which you ascertain through the olfactory bulb in your brain, among other ways of ascertaining that.
00:51:23You can do it through sight and a lot of other ways as well. The bottom line is this. More different,
00:51:29hotter, right? But we're not curating for that when we're spending too much time looking for the body
00:51:35double. We're very narcissistic as creatures, I get it. But the more narcissistic you are and the more
00:51:40that you're picking your dating partners as opposed to somebody who actually loves you and said, "I'd
00:51:44be the perfect person for her." They're not saying it's just like her. They're saying it's enough like
00:51:49her and then enough different than her as well. That's principle number two of the protocol.
00:51:54Look for difference, not just similarity. Number three, don't fear breaking up.
00:52:02Don't fear the breakup. I've talked about this a little bit before, but if you're paralyzed
00:52:08by the possible pain, you won't do what you need to do. So this really is tied to step one of the
00:52:14protocol. You know, if you're going into business and you're horribly, horribly afraid of having a
00:52:20mishap in business, you're gonna make bad business decisions. Now, if you're not afraid at all,
00:52:24you're also gonna make bad business decisions. But all of us are a little bit afraid. I'm not worried
00:52:28about that. But people who are paralyzed by fear almost always make non-entrepreneurial decisions,
00:52:34and that's fatal when it comes to romance. Don't fear. Now, let me be a little bit more specific
00:52:41about this. Have courage even if you do feel fear because that's really what it's all about.
00:52:47Feel the fear and act anyway. Say, "Bring it on. Bring on the risk." When a relationship dissolves,
00:52:57that they have a tendency to rate mental pain at a pretty significant level. It's slightly more
00:53:05than three on a one to seven scale of mental pain severity. People have actually looked at that,
00:53:10measured that, but it falls. It falls much faster than you think. Your brain is designed to make you
00:53:18think that when you're in pain, it's never gonna go away. The reason for that is because your brain
00:53:22wants you to avoid doing things that are painful to you. These things are threats. But you know beyond
00:53:28your just basic troglodyte limbic system that there's lots of things that you need to do,
00:53:33and that means you need to understand that whereas your limbic system is saying this pain is permanent,
00:53:38it's lying to you. It's transient. And therefore, you will walk into a situation in which there is
00:53:44possible pain. What do we know about that three on a one to seven scale? It goes down on average by
00:53:52about 0.07 points on that scale each week. So if you're a 3.5 in pain after a breakup on average,
00:54:00you can expect to feel a little bit better each week, where after six weeks, you're gonna feel
00:54:04less than half as bad about it. And by that point, less than half as bad is a pretty normal level of
00:54:09pain in your life, and you're probably gonna be dating again. And that's within six months. Okay,
00:54:13now one of the quick way to deal with this, by the way, really interesting literature that talks
00:54:18about how mental pain is affected by taking acetaminophen in Europe. If you're in Europe,
00:54:23that's called paracetamol. The brand name in the United States is Tylenol. And it turns out that
00:54:28it has an impact on this. Now, I'm not recommending you do this. See your healthcare professionals,
00:54:33but extra strength Tylenol, it tends to lower heartbreak. You know, don't take more than it
00:54:39says in the label folks, obviously, to do that. But that's an interesting thing because once again,
00:54:44psychology is biology. Okay, now I've gone a long time on this. I'm gonna go more on this. As a
00:54:49matter of fact, let me go back to where I started, which is the love of my life, my wife, Esther.
00:54:54She's the person on whom I'm gonna be laying my eyes as I take my dying breath. This is really
00:55:01a big part of who I am as a person. We've grown up together, you know, through music and
00:55:07graduate school, having kids, career changes. We've moved 20 times. We're like, you know,
00:55:14wanderers, but together. You know, we always joke, "Look, if you leave me, it's fine, but you gotta
00:55:19take me with you." You know? And so I want you to meet her because we're gonna talk about this
00:55:23together. And we do this a lot. We work with couples. She does it more differently than I
00:55:27do because she's actually... Her graduate work was not in behavioral science like mine. Hers was in
00:55:33philosophy and theology. And so we're gonna get together and talk to you a little bit about how
00:55:38we talk together as a couple, two couples that are just getting together or in some various stage of
00:55:45falling in love or staying in love or getting married. And you're gonna see how she thinks
00:55:49about it. Okay. Now, a couple of quick emails and then we'll say goodbye. Linda Bittner
00:55:55by email. Thanks, Linda. I know people arrive at decisions differently, but I don't know if there's
00:56:01a right or wrong way or if there are patterns or types of decision-makers. What can you tell me
00:56:07about this? There are different kinds of decision-makers. Now, I've done work briefly
00:56:12and there's a lot more coming on hemispheric lateralization of the brain where the right and
00:56:16left hemispheres do different things. There are some people who are more right hemisphere
00:56:20decision-makers, which is to say they rely more on intuition and gut than their decisions. There
00:56:25are some who are more left-side decision-makers, which is that they rely more on data. Men tend to
00:56:31be more data-oriented and things-oriented in their decision-making, women more on intuition and on
00:56:37their gut. Obviously, the best way to do it, I hope obviously at this point if you're a fan of the show
00:56:41is you gotta use both. And if you're a natural left-side decision-maker, rely more on the right,
00:56:47consult more your gut. Think more that way and vice versa is the way that I think about it. But those
00:56:52are the two ways to do it and neither one is actually better. One of the things that the best
00:56:56couples, the most successful couples do is that they wire their hemispheres together so they can
00:57:02make smart decisions based on each other's point of view, and especially true if they're more different,
00:57:08not more the same. Tom Fitzsimmons by email, "Quick question on the wellness front." This is a good
00:57:15biology one. "I've been using cold plunges as a coffee replacement." Why choose between them, Tom?
00:57:22Anyway, "39 degrees in the tub for two minutes." Tom, you're a tough hombre. "First thing in the
00:57:26morning and I'm loving the effects." A lot of people do. "I'm curious what your take is on
00:57:30cold plunges and what the data actually say." Worth it? We're overblown. People love it just like you.
00:57:36Phenomenal. The reason that you like it instead of your coffee is because it's actually doing
00:57:40a lot of the things that coffee does, most specifically it's spiking your dopamine and
00:57:44your cortisol, which is a stress hormone produced in the cortex of your adrenal glands sitting above
00:57:50your kidneys. Great, but there's no long-run studies yet. Very, very few studies are actually
00:57:56tracking even beyond a few months versus sauna, which is very, very well studied and extremely
00:58:02beneficial and totally safe. I'm not saying that cold plunge isn't safe. I'm just saying that it's
00:58:08not very well studied. And so you do it and you like it and that's great, but we don't know if
00:58:14long-term exposure to spikes of cortisol have effects on aging. There's a lot that we don't
00:58:19know yet with respect to elevated cortisol. So proceed with caution, proceed with your eyes
00:58:23open and as always, be your own lab. Well, that's it. We've come to the end. Let me know your thoughts
00:58:30on this or anything else. Office hours at arthurbrooks.com. Like and subscribe on Spotify,
00:58:35YouTube, Apple, wherever you're watching or listening to this and leave a comment. I promise
00:58:39I'll read it. Do follow me on socials, on Instagram, on LinkedIn, on all the other platforms because
00:58:44that's where I leave a lot of my content that's actually not even here. Order the meaning of your
00:58:48life to learn more about everything I've talked about today and everything I'm going to be talking
00:58:51about in the next few weeks. And in the meantime, as you're waiting for my book to come to you,
00:58:56have a great week. Spread these ideas, lift other people up in bonds of happiness and love,
00:59:00and I'll see you next week.

Key Takeaway

In an age of declining intimacy, Arthur Brooks argues that by understanding the neurobiology of love and treating romance as an entrepreneurial risk, individuals can climb the 'Ladder of Love' to find ultimate life meaning.

Highlights

Marriage and cohabitation rates have significantly declined since 1950

Timeline

Introduction and Personal Journey

Arthur Brooks opens the episode by expressing his passion for romantic love as a primary vehicle for finding life meaning. He shares his personal success story, having celebrated his 34th wedding anniversary with three children and four grandsons. This introduction establishes his credibility as a 'happiness teacher' who practices what he preaches regarding long-term commitment. He notes that such stories are becoming increasingly rare in modern society, which sets the stage for a deeper discussion. Brooks invites the audience to join his movement of using science and ideas to build a better, happier world.

The Decline of Romantic Love Statistics

The speaker introduces his upcoming book, 'The Meaning of Your Life,' and highlights romantic love as the first rung on the ladder to purpose. He presents startling data showing that U.S. households with married couples dropped from 79% in 1949 to just 47% today. Even cohabitation and sexual activity among 20-somethings have seen significant declines since the late 1980s. Brooks characterizes this trend as a 'psychogenic epidemic of unhappiness' that is highly contagious despite lack of biological origin. He argues that this unwillingness to engage in romantic life is a major contributor to the current misery in the population.

The Four Stages of Falling in Love

Brooks provides a detailed breakdown of the neurochemical cascade that occurs when humans fall in love. The process begins with sex hormones like testosterone and estrogen, followed by norepinephrine and dopamine, which create a sense of euphoric addiction. The third stage involves a significant drop in serotonin, leading to the obsessive rumination often mistaken for 'being in love.' Finally, the process culminates in the release of oxytocin and vasopressin, which facilitate deep bonding and kinship. Understanding these stages is crucial for identifying why relationships fail or why feelings can be so overwhelming and stressful.

Companionate Love and Relationship Pathologies

The goal of a successful pair bond is to transition from passionate love to 'companionate love,' which is defined as deep friendship. Brooks explains that relationships often fail because partners move through the neurochemical stages at different speeds or stop prematurely. He describes 'dark triad' individuals who stop at the thrill stage and 'hemophilic' individuals who fall in love too quickly, scaring off partners. Knowledge of these patterns allows for 'metacognition,' where individuals use their executive brain centers to manage their emotions rather than being controlled by them. He encourages those who suffer from falling in love too fast to study their own emotive patterns.

The Divinity of Love and the Ladder of Love

Moving from biology to philosophy, Brooks explores how various religious traditions and thinkers like Einstein view love as a manifestation of the divine. He references Plato’s Symposium and the 'Ladder of Love' described by the prophetess Diotima to Socrates. The ladder begins with physical attraction to a single person but eventually ascends to the love of souls, then to beautiful ideas, and finally to the meaning of life itself. This section emphasizes that romantic attraction is not merely animalistic but an initiation into higher philosophical understanding. Brooks argues that loving another person is the most effective way to realize that the world is not solely about oneself.

The Entrepreneurial Protocol: Risk and Rejection

To overcome the 'love depression,' Brooks advises listeners to treat their love lives with an entrepreneurial spirit by taking strategic risks. He cites research by Jean Twenge showing that younger generations are more risk-averse, which correlates with lower rates of romance. He shares a story of a man who was rejected after confessing his love, yet felt empowered because the rejection didn't kill him. Heartbreak is framed as a necessary learning tool that builds social-cognitive maturity, romantic agency, and coherence. Brooks asserts that failing in relationships is the only way to eventually succeed in finding a long-term partner.

Technology, Complementarity, and Q&A

The final section addresses the impact of dating apps and the importance of 'complementarity'—seeking differences rather than 'body doubles.' He cites a 1995 T-shirt study to show that biological attraction is often driven by immunological differences perceived through scent. Brooks then answers listener emails regarding decision-making styles and the wellness benefits of cold plunges versus saunas. He concludes by introducing his wife, Esther, as his partner in both life and philosophical work, promising more collaborative content. The episode ends with a call to action to spread happiness and love through shared ideas.

Community Posts

View all posts