Postman Killer? I Didn’t Expect This (Hoppscotch)

BBetter Stack
Computing/SoftwareSmall Business/StartupsInternet Technology

Transcript

00:00:00This is Hopscotch, a free open source API client that opens almost instantly, runs in your browser, works fully offline, and doesn't force you into a paid seat.
00:00:10Meanwhile, Postman takes around 10 seconds to launch, it uses hundreds of megabytes of RAM, and it locks collaboration behind subscriptions.
00:00:18Nowadays, a lot of developers aren't trying to tweak Postman anymore, they're just switching to better alternatives.
00:00:24Let me show you exactly why and whether it's actually worth it.
00:00:30Now, Hopscotch is a lightweight, open source API development ecosystem.
00:00:38You can build, test, document, and collaborate on APIs like REST, GraphQL, WebSocket SSE, and MQTT, all inside a browser tab without some heavy Electron app that's required.
00:00:50It's built to be fast and local first.
00:00:52You can use it with zero install for basics, it works fully offline as a PWA, and it stores
00:00:57data locally instead of forcing you into the cloud.
00:01:00You also get unlimited free workspaces and collaborators, this is the big difference between Postman.
00:01:06We can even self-host this or just run it without even logging in, if we want the lightest version.
00:01:11If you enjoy content that speeds up your dev workflow, be sure to subscribe to the Better Stack channel.
00:01:16Watch this.
00:01:17So, no login, there's no install required.
00:01:19I open Hopscotch in my browser, and I'm good to go.
00:01:22They do have a desktop app you could also download if you're going to be using it more often.
00:01:26Now, once I'm in, I create a new request, I set it to get, and I hit the echo endpoint.
00:01:33That runs as we expect.
00:01:34I can then add any query parameters here, and then a custom header, and press send.
00:01:40My response comes back almost instantly as we expected with formatted JSON.
00:01:44Now, we could save this to a collection like this.
00:01:48Then I could create an environment variable, switch the environment, and resend that request.
00:01:53Done.
00:01:54Super straightforward, which is great.
00:01:55Okay, now we have this.
00:01:57This is the basics, kind of like Postman.
00:01:59All right, now let's try WebSocket.
00:02:00This part was honestly a bit flaky, so they do need to improve this, but I'm going to be
00:02:05using this URL because it seems to run correctly.
00:02:08I paste the endpoint.
00:02:09We're going to click connect, and then I'm going to send this message, and immediately
00:02:14we see the response stream.
00:02:16Now, if you're worried about migrating, there's a one-click import for Postman collection,
00:02:21so you can bridge this over super fast.
00:02:23That's the kind of speed most of us are wanting anyways, pretty much less waiting is what
00:02:27we're after.
00:02:28Now, let's compare it directly with Postman and the areas that actually affect your daily
00:02:33workflow.
00:02:34Postman can take around 10 seconds and use about 400 megabytes of RAM, while Hopscotch
00:02:39opens in under a second, and its desktop app is around 40 megabytes.
00:02:44Then Postman requires login and is cloud dependent, while Hopscotch works fully offline as a PWA.
00:02:51For a collaboration, Postman limits you to three free members, but Hopscotch offers unlimited
00:02:56free workspaces and rules, so this is great when you're scaling, you're working with a
00:02:59bit more of a team.
00:03:01Since Postman is a cloud-first tool, it's not private or self-hosted, and Hopscotch is local-first
00:03:06with optional cloud or fully self-hosted.
00:03:08Finally, Postman is going to charge per seat for teams, and Hopscotch claims, at least they
00:03:13are right now, they're free forever.
00:03:15You can also get one-click Postman and Insomnia imports, a browser extension for cores, and
00:03:21a CLI for CI and CD workflows.
00:03:23For many developers, it feels like what Postman used to be a long time ago.
00:03:27Now, from a dev standpoint, it's incredibly lightweight.
00:03:31You can almost feel the speed immediately.
00:03:33The UI is really clean for being this open source tool, and there's not much clutter going
00:03:38on here.
00:03:39Also, real-time collaboration just works without complicated permission setups.
00:03:43You're able to work offline even with local host APIs, which is huge for back-end development.
00:03:49And finally, the updated JQ filtering and improved scripting make request manipulation much more
00:03:54powerful.
00:03:55Plus, the portable desktop apps have a tiny footprint compared to a typical Electron-based
00:04:00tool.
00:04:01Now, let's be fair here, I just rambled off a bunch of good things.
00:04:04It is really cool, but there are downsides.
00:04:06The cloud version includes light telemetry, so if that concerns you, you'll want to self-host
00:04:11or use it locally.
00:04:13Larger features are still growing, so if you need advanced workflows to work with deep
00:04:17monitoring or complex mocking setups, Postman is honestly still going to be stronger here.
00:04:23And some of the newer documentation features are still in beta as they continue to evolve.
00:04:28That said, for most day-to-day development workflow, there are a ton of pros here that
00:04:33we get with Hopscotch.
00:04:34So should you actually make the switch, or the hop, to Hopscotch?
00:04:38Well, if it's just you running tests, that's an easy yes.
00:04:41If you're a front-end or back-end engineer, you'll likely save time every day just from
00:04:46the speed alone.
00:04:47But if you are looking for a free, cheaper alternatives, that's another yes factor.
00:04:52Small to medium teams can switch without worrying about collaboration limits, but if you work
00:04:56on larger projects or larger teams, you might end up using Hopscotch for some development,
00:05:02but you're still going to rely on Postman around those heavy workflows.
00:05:05Hopscotch is open-source and free, so it's definitely worth trying.
00:05:09It could be a real alternative to Postman in a different route to working with APIs.
00:05:13I've linked Hopscotch in the description.
00:05:15Are you still using Postman, or have you already made the switch?
00:05:19If you enjoy AI coding tools and open-source alternatives, be sure to subscribe.
00:05:23We'll see you in another video.

Key Takeaway

Hopscotch offers a high-performance, open-source, and cost-effective alternative to Postman, prioritizing speed and local-first development for modern engineering teams.

Highlights

Hopscotch is a lightweight, open-source API client that offers a fast, local-first alternative to the increasingly heavy and subscription-based Postman.

The tool supports multiple protocols including REST, GraphQL, WebSockets, SSE, and MQTT, all accessible through a browser or a tiny 40MB desktop app.

Key advantages include zero-cost collaboration with unlimited workspaces and members, whereas Postman limits free teams and charges per seat.

Hopscotch enables full offline functionality as a Progressive Web App (PWA), allowing developers to work on localhost APIs without mandatory cloud syncing.

Migration is simplified through one-click imports for existing Postman and Insomnia collections, lowering the barrier for developers to switch tools.

While excellent for daily dev tasks, it currently lacks some of Postman's advanced features like deep monitoring and complex mocking setups.

Timeline

Introduction to the Postman Alternative

The speaker introduces Hopscotch as a "Postman Killer" due to its instant launch times and open-source nature. He contrasts it with Postman, which takes about 10 seconds to open and consumes hundreds of megabytes of RAM. The narrative emphasizes that developers are looking for alternatives because Postman has become heavy and locks collaboration behind paywalls. This section sets the stage by highlighting the frustration with current industry-standard tools. It establishes the core value proposition of Hopscotch: speed, efficiency, and freedom from forced subscriptions.

Core Features and Local-First Architecture

Hopscotch is described as a comprehensive API development ecosystem supporting REST, GraphQL, and even IoT protocols like MQTT. The speaker explains the "local-first" philosophy, noting that data is stored locally rather than being forced into a cloud environment. A major selling point mentioned is the ability to have unlimited free workspaces and collaborators, a sharp departure from Postman's restrictive model. Users can even self-host the platform or run it as a PWA without any installation. This flexibility is positioned as a way to significantly speed up professional development workflows.

Live Demo: Requests and WebSockets

The video moves into a practical demonstration showing how to execute GET requests and handle query parameters or custom headers. The speaker notes that the UI returns formatted JSON almost instantly, providing a snappy user experience. He also tests the WebSocket functionality, though he candidly admits this specific feature felt a bit "flaky" and needs improvement. To address migration concerns, he demonstrates the one-click import feature for Postman collections to show how easily users can transition. This section proves that Hopscotch handles the essential daily tasks of an API developer with minimal friction.

Direct Comparison: Hopscotch vs. Postman

A side-by-side comparison reveals that Hopscotch uses only 40MB of RAM compared to Postman's 400MB. The speaker highlights that Hopscotch is a local-first tool that works offline, whereas Postman is cloud-dependent and requires a login. Collaboration limits are a major focus, as Hopscotch offers unlimited scaling for teams while Postman limits free users to three members. The speaker suggests that Hopscotch feels like "what Postman used to be" before it became overly commercialized. This direct comparison provides concrete metrics for developers to justify making a tool switch.

Developer Benefits and Technical Advantages", "description": "The speaker dives deeper into the developer experience, praising the clean UI and the lack of clutter. He emphasizes the importance of working with localhost APIs offline, which is a critical requirement for backend engineers. Technical improvements like JQ filtering and enhanced scripting are highlighted as powerful tools for request manipulation. The portable desktop app is noted for its tiny footprint compared to typical Electron-based software. These features collectively contribute to a workflow that feels faster and more responsive during active coding sessions.

The analysis concludes with a balanced view of the tool's limitations, such as light telemetry in the cloud version and the absence of complex monitoring features. The speaker explains that while it is perfect for individuals and small teams, enterprise users with heavy mocking needs might still require Postman. He recommends the switch for frontend and backend engineers who value speed and cost-efficiency. Ultimately, Hopscotch is presented as a viable, open-source path for API development that is worth a trial. The video ends by encouraging the community to share their experiences with moving away from legacy API clients.

Community Posts

View all posts