“Demonising Men Is Not A Good Strategy” - Richard Reeves

CChris Williamson
Mental HealthParentingMarriage

Transcript

00:00:00What's the current status of the feminism movement?
00:00:04How do you think of it
00:00:04when you come to think about its factions?
00:00:06- It's very hard for me to answer that
00:00:07because I see it through the lens that I approach.
00:00:09And I am at quite a lot of meetings and conferences stuff now,
00:00:13which would be described as feminist meetings.
00:00:16And I would say that slowly but surely,
00:00:19the women's movement or feminist movement
00:00:21is coming to realize that demonizing or dismissing men
00:00:26is not a good strategy.
00:00:29It's happening patchily and slowly but surely,
00:00:31but it is happening.
00:00:32I'm seeing a lot of leaders in those spaces saying,
00:00:36okay, we have got to do better about the boys and the men.
00:00:39Now, you might say, well, they're only doing it
00:00:41for tactical reasons or political reasons.
00:00:42And they will very often say,
00:00:43because it's good for women, right?
00:00:45And so I have this interesting disagreement with them
00:00:46and I'm very open about this.
00:00:47They say we should care about boys and men
00:00:49because we care about women.
00:00:50And I'm saying, we should care about boys and men.
00:00:52I just end the sentence earlier than you, right?
00:00:55In the same way that we don't say we should care about women
00:00:58because it's good for the economy or good for men, right?
00:01:00I think we should care about boys and men more generally.
00:01:03- I've had to do that too.
00:01:04I heard this piece about zero-sum empathy
00:01:08and I tried to legitimize the reason.
00:01:13There was a lot of things and it wasn't just this,
00:01:15but I remember I sort of tossed this coin into the pool
00:01:18that I knew would be effective,
00:01:19which was if you don't care about boys and men falling behind
00:01:26and also whine about there being no good men to date,
00:01:29that is the equivalent of sort of mating logic seppuku,
00:01:33that you are creating the precise dearth
00:01:34of eligible partners that you say that you and your daughters
00:01:38and your friends and your sisters are looking for.
00:01:40Like if you're not prepared to help boys and men,
00:01:43you can't go, "Where are all the good men at?"
00:01:46Because that's precisely what is causing
00:01:48the lack of eligible partners that you're talking about.
00:01:50But I didn't want to have to couch good men are good
00:01:54in as much as they can be of service to you as a woman.
00:01:58It's just that we should care about
00:02:00the falling behind of any group.
00:02:02- We should care about human flourishing.
00:02:04And if there's a group in society that aren't doing well,
00:02:06then we should care about them.
00:02:07I just think that's just, for me,
00:02:09that's just a straightforward moral proposition.
00:02:11Now I'm also obviously different groups
00:02:14of different agendas, right?
00:02:16And so if you care about this group or that issue,
00:02:20because it affects the other issue, I'm fine with that.
00:02:22So people kind of say like Melinda French Gates
00:02:25has supported me and Gary Barker
00:02:28because it's part of a gender equality thing, right?
00:02:30And she's very clear.
00:02:31She says it's not good for women and girls
00:02:32if boys and men are struggling, right?
00:02:35Now you might say, "Oh, okay."
00:02:37So this is where the kind of, again,
00:02:38the reactionaries will be like,
00:02:39"Oh, of course she has to couch it as that."
00:02:42I'm like, "Guys, for the love of God,
00:02:43"she is a global feminist.
00:02:44"What do you want?"
00:02:45And she's supporting my work.
00:02:47She's supporting boys and men's work.
00:02:49No, no, no, they're the purists.
00:02:51The other ones are saying, "No, no, no,
00:02:52"she has to completely come over to our side."
00:02:54I'm like, "Guys, take a win."
00:02:55Of course, as a feminist, she says
00:02:57she's going to couch it that way, right?
00:02:59That's okay.
00:03:00Do you find yourself doing the same thing?
00:03:04Couching it that way?
00:03:04No.
00:03:05No, I don't do it openly.
00:03:07With Melinda and with others,
00:03:09I was at a Reykjavik forum with some leading women.
00:03:12I'm just like, no, my position
00:03:14and the position of the American Institute
00:03:15for Boys and Men is just very straightforward.
00:03:17We care about boys and men doing better and flourishing.
00:03:20We just care about that, period.
00:03:21Now, is that also good for the economy?
00:03:23Is it good for families?
00:03:24Is it good for women?
00:03:25Is it good for...
00:03:26Yes, yes, of course, yes.
00:03:29In the same way that the Women's Services
00:03:30Prevention Initiative, their tagline is,
00:03:32"When women are healthy, communities thrive."
00:03:34I'm like, true.
00:03:35Also true that when men are healthy, communities thrive.
00:03:38But you don't have to condition it.
00:03:40And I honestly think there's a deeper point there,
00:03:41which is that men in particular,
00:03:44they kind of see the conditioning coming.
00:03:48You see it like, oh, well, if there's something bad happens,
00:03:52like men do bad thing, A.
00:03:54Oh, now we should care about boys and men.
00:03:57And they see that conditionality.
00:03:58They see, oh, you only care about me if X,
00:04:01if I do something bad or something bad happens.
00:04:03And what they actually need to hear is,
00:04:04no, dude, we just care about you.
00:04:06Yeah.
00:04:07What do you make of the current state of mating and dating?
00:04:11Well, as a 56-year-old man who's been married
00:04:13for almost my entire adult life, my...
00:04:15Your expert subject.
00:04:17(laughing)
00:04:18Fortunately, I have three sons in their 20s
00:04:20at various stages, that helps.
00:04:21And a bunch of younger friends.
00:04:24I mean, it comes back to bits of this politicization point,
00:04:29which is, I worry that the message that young women
00:04:34are getting from the left is,
00:04:37life's really tough for women now.
00:04:39And it's the fault of all those men and the patriarchy.
00:04:43And the message that young men are getting from the right is,
00:04:46life's pretty tough for young men right now.
00:04:48And it's the fault of all those woke feminists
00:04:49and those women.
00:04:51So they're being encouraged, respectively,
00:04:53to blame each other for their real problems.
00:04:56That is a colossal waste of political energy and not true.
00:05:01It's also creating some difficulties, I think,
00:05:02around dating, mating, et cetera,
00:05:04because we do see now that that political polarization
00:05:07is affecting dating and mating.
00:05:09I worry a lot, and Dan Cox has written for us on this,
00:05:12that you see this decline in dating in high school
00:05:15and among kind of young adults, and that's a huge problem,
00:05:18because that's where you develop the relational skills,
00:05:20the ability to endure and deliver rejection gracefully,
00:05:23et cetera.
00:05:24I worry a lot about that.
00:05:26But I also worry that,
00:05:28and maybe there's something we could talk about,
00:05:30that there's something about the marketplace
00:05:33mate value evo psych stuff
00:05:36that I know you're very interested in.
00:05:38I've revised my, Paul Eastwick has a book out
00:05:40called "Bonded by Evolution."
00:05:41Do you know his stuff?
00:05:42- Yeah, I had him on the show.
00:05:43- Oh, you did?
00:05:44- "Bonded by Evolution."
00:05:45- Right.
00:05:46And I'm not going full Eastwick on you here.
00:05:48- Please don't.
00:05:48- But I do find that something,
00:05:51here's the bit I do like about it,
00:05:52is that if we're serious about thinking about
00:05:54kind of ancestral mating patterns,
00:05:56we do have to take seriously the fact
00:05:57that we didn't live in cities of 10 million people
00:05:59with a phone, right?
00:06:02That wasn't the marketplace we faced.
00:06:03We were in smaller groups.
00:06:04So maybe you've done this with him, smaller groups,
00:06:06and we kind of would know these people,
00:06:08and they'd kind of come with us.
00:06:09And the whole idea of kind of mate value
00:06:11doesn't, does shift a little bit over time.
00:06:14And so my middle ground here is that it's clearly insane
00:06:18not to suggest that there isn't something,
00:06:19you know, quasi market or mate value thing going on.
00:06:23But there's also something quite interesting
00:06:25about this idea that kind of knowing somebody
00:06:27or someone being known by the people among you
00:06:29that coming socially sanctioned,
00:06:31like someone you meet through the workplace,
00:06:33friend of a friend, et cetera,
00:06:35that that's very powerful as opposed to someone
00:06:37you just algorithmically got attached to on an app
00:06:39on the other side of New York, right?
00:06:41That's not how we evolved.
00:06:43- I agree. - Right.
00:06:44- It's a very sexy argument.
00:06:45And the argument is mate value,
00:06:48he thinks mate value simply doesn't exist.
00:06:50That there are no, there is no way
00:06:53that beyond the first look,
00:06:55anybody is more or less preferable than somebody else.
00:06:58That revealed bonded preferences over time
00:07:00end up flattening the mating dynamic down,
00:07:03that tens could get with threes,
00:07:05and that threes could get with tens.
00:07:06- That wasn't how I read him.
00:07:07I didn't read him that way.
00:07:10I think that's an exaggeration,
00:07:11but maybe I'm wrong about that.
00:07:13I think he just, it just gets flatter.
00:07:15Not that it flattens completely.
00:07:16- He said there is no, there is no such thing
00:07:18after a couple of meetings.
00:07:20There is literally no such thing as mate value.
00:07:23There is no such thing as a disparity.
00:07:25- So, well, he's more of the expert on his work than I am,
00:07:27but I read it as like mate value is a more complicated idea.
00:07:29- I would agree with that.
00:07:30I would agree with mate value is a more complicated idea.
00:07:33What makes me sort of bristle a little bit
00:07:37or what makes me concerned is
00:07:40if you've got this world that basically flattens,
00:07:45it makes egalitarian the mating market
00:07:48is one way that you could read it, right?
00:07:51- No one's hot.
00:07:52- Yeah, no one's hot and no one's ugly.
00:07:53- Yeah, what's the Kurt Vonnegut short story?
00:07:56Harry Bergeron, someone could check this,
00:08:00where the minister, do you know this story?
00:08:02- No.
00:08:03- The Ministry for Equality levels everybody out, right?
00:08:07And so it's satire.
00:08:09So it's like, if you're a really good dancer,
00:08:10you have to go wear weights around your feet.
00:08:12If you're beautiful,
00:08:14you have to have plastic surgery to make you less so.
00:08:16And if you're ugly, have plastic surgery to make you more so.
00:08:18But one, it really like the main character story is like,
00:08:21if you're intelligent, if you're high IQ.
00:08:23- That's right.
00:08:26- Yeah, Harrison Bergeron.
00:08:29If you're intelligent, they put a thing in your ear
00:08:31that's just making a noise all the time to distract you.
00:08:33- It distracts you, yeah.
00:08:34- Yeah, and it's obviously like a kind of
00:08:36a flattening type thing.
00:08:37So look, if the idea is like,
00:08:40there is just no difference
00:08:41in how attractive someone is as a mate to anybody else,
00:08:46I think that's not, I think that's batshit crazy.
00:08:49But over time, even with the revealed preferences,
00:08:54the revealed value that occurs
00:09:00as you get to know somebody a little bit better,
00:09:02that this is how beautiful elements of someone's personality
00:09:08and the way they hold themselves and their poise
00:09:10and their patience and their regulation
00:09:11and all the rest of it, sort of appear over time,
00:09:15I think that denying the fact
00:09:17that there are more and less preferable mates,
00:09:20and this isn't just idiosyncratic,
00:09:21that if you were to take a big broad survey,
00:09:24that many people would rank as more preferable,
00:09:28even if you knew them for four years,
00:09:30and other people would rank less preferable
00:09:33even if you know them for four years.
00:09:34- Yeah, my understanding of it, and again,
00:09:35like I'm talking about, we're talking about his work now,
00:09:37but is that over time, you learn more about someone,
00:09:40and so more of their kind of different,
00:09:42the different elements of mate value come to the fore.
00:09:45So if I just, if you just see me, you don't hear me speak,
00:09:49you just see me, maybe I'm mewing, so I look great.
00:09:52- Yes, you do. - Right, like, ah, right.
00:09:54But then, or I don't, I look, I don't look great,
00:09:57but then we talk for a while,
00:09:58and let's say I'm kind or funny,
00:10:00or let's say I'm an asshole, right?
00:10:03That's gonna change very significantly,
00:10:05and then you see me doing something hard for somebody else.
00:10:07Right, you see me taking care of my mom,
00:10:08you see me, no, you see me working hard at them, right?
00:10:10All these things are adding up.
00:10:12- Right, revealed over time. - Yeah.
00:10:13- That was the best, that was the best bit of what Paul said.
00:10:16I really, I really thought it was a nice twist
00:10:20on the very shallow, sort of typical understood,
00:10:25and this is the internet interpretation of mate value, right?
00:10:29And what's interesting about this is it's almost exclusively
00:10:31for short-term mating.
00:10:33- Absolutely. - Almost everything,
00:10:34all of the mating advice is for short-term mating as well.
00:10:36- It's not like, so actually I got into this argument
00:10:39with Shadi Hamid for a piece of the post where he said,
00:10:42"Are you telling me to settle?"
00:10:43'Cause I said, we're talking about marriage,
00:10:44and I think the problem with the marketplace idea
00:10:47is that it sort of suggests that it's over once you've mated.
00:10:52But of course, that's just the beginning,
00:10:55and the story you tell about your relationship,
00:10:59and the way that the relationship evolves over time
00:11:02within that story you're telling,
00:11:04and the way you treat each other
00:11:05as you become different people over the decades,
00:11:08that's the job.
00:11:09And so the other problem with the marketplace
00:11:11is it doesn't capture that it's about maximizing,
00:11:13and you match, and so on.
00:11:14- Then you cash out. - Yeah, it's like,
00:11:16and you've made a great match, and that's the solution.
00:11:18No, no, no.
00:11:19And I said this to Shadi, and I said to others too,
00:11:21I said, sure, you obviously, if you're lucky,
00:11:23you'll fall head over heels in love,
00:11:24and it will just be obvious, and you'll find somebody,
00:11:27but it is much less about the wife you choose
00:11:30than it is about the husband you become.
00:11:33A quick aside, most people think that they're dehydrated
00:11:36because they don't drink enough water.
00:11:37Turns out, water alone isn't just the problem.
00:11:40It's also what's missing from it,
00:11:41which is why, for the last five years,
00:11:43I've started every single morning
00:11:45with a cold glass of Element in water.
00:11:47Element is an electrolyte drink with a science-backed ratio
00:11:50of sodium, potassium, and magnesium.
00:11:52No sugar, no coloring, no artificial ingredients,
00:11:55just the stuff that your body actually needs to function.
00:11:58This plays a critical role in reducing your muscle cramps
00:12:01and your fatigue, it optimizes your brain health,
00:12:03it regulates your appetite, and it helps curb cravings.
00:12:06I keep talking about it
00:12:07because I genuinely feel the difference
00:12:09when I use it versus when I don't.
00:12:10And best of all, there's a no questions asked refund policy
00:12:13with an unlimited duration.
00:12:14So if you're on the fence,
00:12:15you can buy it and try it for as long as you like,
00:12:17and if you don't like it for any reason,
00:12:19they just give you your money back.
00:12:20You don't even need to return the box.
00:12:21That's how confident they are that you'll love it.
00:12:22And they offer free shipping in the US.
00:12:24Right now, you can get a free sample pack
00:12:26of Element's most popular flavors with your first purchase
00:12:29by going to the link in the description below
00:12:31or heading to drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom.
00:12:34That's drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom.
00:12:39Congratulations, you made it to the end of a clip
00:12:41and the full length episode is available right here.
00:12:45Go on.

Key Takeaway

Sustainable social progress and healthy dating markets require caring for the flourishing of boys and men as a standalone moral necessity rather than a conditional service to women.

Highlights

Feminism is shifts toward acknowledging that the dismissal or demonization of men is an ineffective long-term strategy.

The dearth of eligible partners results directly from the failure to support the development and flourishing of boys and men.

A zero-sum empathy model prevents the recognition that community health requires both men and women to be healthy.

High school dating rates are declining, which stunts the development of essential relational skills like handling rejection gracefully.

Mate value is not static but reveals itself through personality traits like patience and emotional regulation over years of interaction.

Long-term relationship success depends less on the initial choice of a spouse and more on the partner one becomes over decades.

Timeline

The shift in feminist strategy regarding men

  • Feminist movements are slowly realizing that demonizing men is a failed political and social strategy.
  • Advocacy for men is often framed as a secondary benefit for women rather than an intrinsic good.
  • Universal care for men should be a straightforward moral proposition without requiring a utilitarian justification.

Leaders within feminist spaces are beginning to address the struggles of boys and men, though often couching it in terms of how it benefits women and girls. This tactical framing creates a disagreement with those who believe men's well-being should be valued independently. Just as women's rights are not justified by their benefit to the economy, men's flourishing stands as its own moral end.

Consequences of zero-sum empathy and mating logic

  • Ignoring the decline of men creates the very lack of eligible partners that women frequently lament.
  • Zero-sum empathy suggests that caring for one gender inherently detracts from the other.
  • Human flourishing requires attention to any group that is falling behind in society.

The 'mating logic seppuku' occurs when society ignores the struggles of young men while simultaneously complaining about a lack of high-quality partners for women. This paradox highlights the interconnectedness of gender outcomes. Empathy should be inclusive, focusing on the flourishing of all humans regardless of their group identity.

The danger of conditional care for men

  • Men perceive when social concern for them is conditional on their behavior or utility to others.
  • Healthy communities thrive only when both men and women are individually healthy.
  • The American Institute for Boys and Men promotes the flourishing of men as a period-end goal.

Global feminist figures like Melinda French Gates support work for boys and men because gender equality is not a one-sided equation. However, there is a deeper psychological need for men to hear that they are cared for inherently, not just when they do something 'bad' or to serve a broader economic or familial purpose. Removing these conditions is essential for genuine engagement with men's issues.

Political polarization and the decline of relational skills

  • Ideological extremes encourage men and women to blame each other for their respective struggles.
  • Dating frequency is declining among high schoolers and young adults.
  • The lack of early dating experience prevents the development of vital skills like delivering rejection gracefully.

The left often blames the patriarchy for women's hardships, while the right blames 'woke' feminism for men's struggles, resulting in a colossal waste of political energy. This polarization manifests in a measurable decline in youthful dating. Without these early interactions, young people fail to build the 'relational muscles' necessary for healthy adult partnerships.

Evolutionary psychology and revealed mate value

  • Socially sanctioned meetings through work or friends are more powerful than algorithmic app matches.
  • Mate value is not a static number but a complex set of traits revealed over time.
  • Personality elements like kindness and poise can significantly alter initial attraction levels.

Modern dating apps remove the social context in which human mating evolved, such as small groups and shared workplaces. While some theories suggest mate value flattens over time, it is more accurate to say that deeper layers of value—such as how someone takes care of their family or handles stress—become visible after the initial encounter. Denying these disparities in preference is unrealistic, but recognizing they are revealed slowly provides a more nuanced view of attraction.

The husband you become versus the wife you choose

  • The marketplace model of mating fails to account for the evolution of a relationship after the match is made.
  • Marriage is an ongoing process of becoming different people together over decades.
  • Success in long-term partnership is determined by personal growth and internal behavior rather than just the initial selection.

Standard mating advice focuses almost exclusively on short-term acquisition, treating a match as a 'cash-out' moment. In reality, the work begins after the match. The focus should shift from finding the perfect partner to being a partner who can evolve and maintain the relationship story through the inevitable changes of adult life.

Community Posts

View all posts