The Political Disaster That Is California - David Friedberg

CChris Williamson
Business NewsSmall Business/StartupsTax PlanningComputing/Software

Transcript

00:00:00- What's happening with this California flight stuff?
00:00:02Cause I was with Palmer over Christmas
00:00:04and a bunch of other guys from that side
00:00:07and I didn't know about it.
00:00:10I knew that it was gonna be brought in
00:00:12before the end of the year.
00:00:12It's this sort of sticky thing
00:00:14that seems to be following people around
00:00:15but it's also gonna get worse over time.
00:00:17It seems like there's more and more rumblings
00:00:18that stuff's gonna keep on.
00:00:20This feels like the sort of core engine
00:00:23of California's prosperity since the 1800s
00:00:27is now unraveling.
00:00:30- I'm in a bunch of group chats.
00:00:33I talk to a lot of people.
00:00:34I would say probably a third of people I talk to
00:00:38have already left.
00:00:39You're asking about people leaving, right?
00:00:41And I would say like a survey we did informally in a group,
00:00:46which has been published, talked about,
00:00:48is close to 87% of people are gonna leave.
00:00:52These are the core leaders in tech.
00:00:55And the other thing is I talk to a lot of emerging tech CEOs
00:00:59of startups that are doing really well that are growing
00:01:02and they're all looking to leave.
00:01:03Like there was one company I was talking to,
00:01:04they're gonna move up to Northern California from Southern
00:01:06and they're like, "Now I'm gonna move to Nevada."
00:01:09And that's because they're worried about what's next.
00:01:11So California's in this fundamental sinkhole right now.
00:01:14It goes back to my point about people making promises.
00:01:19In order to get elected, politicians promise people
00:01:22something that they don't have today.
00:01:23That's how you get elected.
00:01:25You don't get elected by saying,
00:01:26"I'm gonna take stuff away from you."
00:01:28The government's gonna do less for you.
00:01:30Show me one politician in the last hundred years
00:01:32who's been elected saying that.
00:01:33So in order, and there's a fundamental kind of like moment,
00:01:38this come to Jesus moment.
00:01:40Can you keep doing these promises?
00:01:41Can you even meet the promises you've already made?
00:01:44And in California, the answer is no.
00:01:46California set up a system where we created
00:01:51the highest tax rate in the country
00:01:53because of all the success in Silicon Valley,
00:01:55all the income that's being generated, all the success
00:01:58and capital gains and whatnot.
00:02:00And use that to fund a bunch of nonsense.
00:02:03The bullet train to nowhere,
00:02:05friggin' like $30 billion in, nothing.
00:02:10- How much is it?
00:02:11- 30 billion.
00:02:12And they've had six CEOs, by the way,
00:02:15that have all been fired, or the one guy just got arrested.
00:02:18It's insane.
00:02:18It was just published that this homeless program,
00:02:22$220 million was spent on it.
00:02:25Six homeless people got themselves out of the cycle
00:02:27of poverty that they were in.
00:02:29You go down the list.
00:02:31- What was it, sorry, just what was that thing
00:02:33about the affordable internet bill?
00:02:37- Rural broadband.
00:02:38- That was it.
00:02:39And for the same amount of money that was spent,
00:02:41I think every American citizen could have got Starlink.
00:02:43- Yeah, and that one, that's a federal problem.
00:02:47I don't- - Yeah, yeah, yeah, but-
00:02:48- You're gonna get me very emotional.
00:02:49I've been very like- - You seem like
00:02:51an emotional guy. - I've been very like
00:02:52unemotional during our talk about science in the future.
00:02:56And then this is the opposite.
00:02:58Okay, this is the bullshit, the opposite that happens
00:03:01when social systems become manifest like rotten.
00:03:05It's a system where people lie to each other
00:03:10in order to keep themselves in power,
00:03:12in order to keep their money flowing,
00:03:14in order to keep this nonsense up and running.
00:03:16People lie to themselves, they lie to their constituents,
00:03:18and the democracy starts to become like, what's the point?
00:03:21Like, does this even work?
00:03:22California in particular, we made a bunch of changes
00:03:27to the pension system, so we have public pensions
00:03:30for public employees in California.
00:03:32And over the past 12 to 15 years,
00:03:37those changes have resulted in a bunch of guarantees
00:03:42to people on their future retirement benefits
00:03:44that the state simply cannot afford to meet.
00:03:47The estimate currently is that there's 600 billion
00:03:49to a trillion dollars in the whole, okay?
00:03:53The state then has a question,
00:03:54how are we going to like pay for all these people
00:03:57all the stuff that we promised them?
00:03:59And that's a big part.
00:04:01And then there's also all the near-term stuff
00:04:03like healthcare costs.
00:04:04Hey, we promised them healthcare.
00:04:05We promised our union workers healthcare.
00:04:07We've got to figure out a way to fund the healthcare
00:04:09because the promises were made.
00:04:11But the promises were never funded.
00:04:13The promises were never possible to be funded.
00:04:16And then suddenly it all comes to roost and everyone's like,
00:04:18well, how are we going to make the payments now?
00:04:20How are we going to fill the hole?
00:04:21That's the situation California's in.
00:04:23California has such a heaping liability problem
00:04:26that it's now you're seeing like all the rats
00:04:29jumping off the ship or they're burning the ship
00:04:32or the people are leaving the ship.
00:04:34I don't know what the right analogy to use is,
00:04:36but that's the chaos that's ensuing in California
00:04:38in this very moment.
00:04:39And so we talk a lot about the billionaire tax.
00:04:42The billionaire tax came about because of one union,
00:04:44one guy at one union called SEIU UHW
00:04:47who set up a scheme where they would tax you 5%
00:04:50of your net worth if your net worth is over a billion dollars,
00:04:52which everyone in this audience is like, who cares?
00:04:54Screw the billionaires.
00:04:55But what it does is it gives the state assembly,
00:04:58the legislature, the ability to, in the future,
00:05:01change the threshold and the amount.
00:05:03So theoretically you could take the 5% on billionaires
00:05:05one time and make it 1% on billionaires every year.
00:05:07- Wasn't this the case with the original income tax?
00:05:11- 1930, it was a 1%.
00:05:14- Tell people the story of how the original income tax-
00:05:16- I mean, the original income tax was pitched
00:05:17because we did not have an income tax in the United States.
00:05:20And that was, again, why this country was founded.
00:05:22It was set up as no taxation without representation.
00:05:26There was a huge tax scheme to fund all of the nonsense
00:05:30that was going on in England.
00:05:32- Careful, careful now.
00:05:34- I mean, at the time, very different,
00:05:37not to speak to the people,
00:05:37but let's call it the aristocracy
00:05:39and what we call the elites today.
00:05:42And by the way, I think about the term, the elites,
00:05:45it's sort of like that Spiderman meme where like,
00:05:47everyone's, you're the elite, you're the elite,
00:05:49you're the elite, like the tech guy's the elite.
00:05:51That's kind of the moment we're in right now.
00:05:53Like the tech guys aren't the elites,
00:05:54but like the tech guys last year were telling,
00:05:56they were calling out the NGOs as the elites
00:05:58and then the, you know, it's just like, everyone's an elite.
00:05:59- Your privilege is more privileged than my privilege.
00:06:02- Yeah, this is all rooted in Marxist philosophies,
00:06:04by the way, it's all this like oppressor oppressed stuff.
00:06:06Like again, but all of those philosophies
00:06:09fundamentally distinguish people's agency.
00:06:12Like this is so critical for people to understand.
00:06:14When you give people a bunch of stuff
00:06:16or you create a governmental system or economic system
00:06:18that says you do X, you get Y,
00:06:20you're a slave to that system.
00:06:22You are now oppressed no matter what anyone tells you.
00:06:26You are not getting risen up and you're not,
00:06:27and pulling other people down
00:06:28doesn't solve any of your problems.
00:06:31Another conversation for another day.
00:06:32But in California, so we started out as a one,
00:06:34and so the way they started the income tax
00:06:36in the United States was they're like,
00:06:37hey, we'll promise everyone 1% on incomes over
00:06:40whatever it was at the time,
00:06:41I think $10,000 a year, you could probably look it up.
00:06:43And that was it.
00:06:44And then over time, it's like, wait, we had to fund a war.
00:06:46So we, and now we're like gonna expand the highway system.
00:06:49- So the original income tax was 1%.
00:06:52- 1% on high net worth people,
00:06:53on high earning people, and that's it.
00:06:55- Jared, chad this and find out
00:06:58how the income tax progressed over time.
00:07:00I wanna see this.
00:07:01- Right, and you can look at this.
00:07:02And so then it became like suddenly today,
00:07:04everyone pays an income tax.
00:07:05In California, I pay 53% income tax.
00:07:08And most people pay an income tax that's,
00:07:11and now they're like creating a whole new tax regime.
00:07:13And I wanna talk about this importantly,
00:07:15what they're trying to do in California.
00:07:17Here you go.
00:07:18It was a temporary war time tax.
00:07:19And you know, again, leading up to this,
00:07:21we had tariffs to fund the government.
00:07:22The government was small.
00:07:23Like the government wasn't meant to be this big system
00:07:26that took care of everyone and did all this stuff.
00:07:28- Keep going.
00:07:29- Coming out of World War II.
00:07:31And here's the income tax started out as 1% on income
00:07:33over $3,000 a year.
00:07:35Okay? - Yep.
00:07:37- And then there was like a progression.
00:07:39They added a 7% top rate later.
00:07:42And then you can kind of see here
00:07:43when the thing kind of expanded.
00:07:45- Oh, wow.
00:07:461944 to 1945 in World War II, the top rate was 94%.
00:07:51- Yeah, they took everyone's money to fund the war.
00:07:53But that set a precedent.
00:07:54Because what happened at that point
00:07:55is after they set the precedent,
00:07:57and then we had this kind of FDR,
00:07:59kind of New Deal expansionism,
00:08:00all the stuff that happened post World War II
00:08:01in the United States, was like, holy crap,
00:08:03we can get the government to do big stuff.
00:08:05Let's do big stuff to make our lives better.
00:08:08You can see that that sound principled.
00:08:10Like it makes sense.
00:08:11It sounds good in principle.
00:08:12But this is where it leads us to today.
00:08:14Because every year, once you start thinking
00:08:15about the government as solving your problems
00:08:17and doing things for you,
00:08:19that becomes something that only escalates up.
00:08:21It never goes down.
00:08:22- The thing about if 51% can vote themselves,
00:08:26what the 49% have got.
00:08:26- So this is the next thing that happened.
00:08:27So now, so that's income.
00:08:29Let's say you've paid your income tax
00:08:32and you own a bunch of stuff.
00:08:33That's now your private property.
00:08:34You own this stuff.
00:08:35That's yours.
00:08:36So now comes along the government or this new bill,
00:08:39the Billionaire Tax Act in California.
00:08:41And for the first time ever in the United States,
00:08:43we're trying to create a wealth tax.
00:08:46It doesn't matter that it's billionaires
00:08:47and it doesn't matter that it's one time or 5%.
00:08:50What you're saying is that the stuff
00:08:51that you've already paid taxes on,
00:08:53that you now own, that's in your backyard,
00:08:55all your iron ore that you've stored in the backyard.
00:08:57- That's correct, get off it.
00:08:58- Yeah, or your cool podcast studio.
00:09:01You own these things.
00:09:02You've paid taxes, you've earned your money,
00:09:04and you bought this stuff.
00:09:05But now the government can come in and say,
00:09:06you know what, we want that lamp.
00:09:08We want half your iron ore.
00:09:09We're gonna take all your private property, right?
00:09:11Your iron ore, they're gonna get all your private property.
00:09:14That's what a wealth tax does,
00:09:16is it taxes people on post-tax earnings.
00:09:18It takes away private property.
00:09:20If you give the government the ability to do that
00:09:22on even 1% of net worth for billionaires,
00:09:26the next step is 5% of the billionaires
00:09:30or maybe 2% of millionaires.
00:09:32And then maybe it's 3% on people making,
00:09:35that have a net worth of a hundred grand a year.
00:09:37And by the way, to figure out how much you have,
00:09:39what your assets are,
00:09:40you gotta send me a list every year of everything you own.
00:09:43So now the government gets to look into your house,
00:09:45not just see what's in your bank account,
00:09:47what stocks you own, but what cars do you own?
00:09:48What's the value of those cars?
00:09:49How much is that art worth?
00:09:51What's everything here worth?
00:09:52Private property rights go out the window
00:09:54when you institute a wealth tax.
00:09:55'Cause now the government has the right
00:09:57to assess all your value
00:09:58and to take anything they want from you based on a vote,
00:10:01where a bunch of people raise their hand and say,
00:10:03we'll increase the tax rate to this.
00:10:045%, 2%, 10%, whatever it is.
00:10:06And here's the threshold, and we'll take it every year.
00:10:09And when you do that, it eventually leads
00:10:13to 51% of people voting to take everything from 49%.
00:10:18That's the worst case.
00:10:20That's the end state of this, is it eats itself.
00:10:23And that's socialism.
00:10:24And so I think that a wealth tax,
00:10:26and look, it's not gonna affect me, this California tax.
00:10:29So don't think that I'm trying to speak my book
00:10:31or whatever the comments or bullshits are.
00:10:34I think this is a fundamental principled issue
00:10:37that by degrading private property rights,
00:10:39we are setting a precedent in the United States
00:10:41that is the foundation of why the United States
00:10:43was set up in the first place,
00:10:44which is for all of us that came to this country
00:10:46to get away from tyrannical governments
00:10:48outside the United States that took all our shit
00:10:50and controlled everything and told us what to do all the time
00:10:53and we came here and we get to have private property.
00:10:55Sure, I'll pay my tax.
00:10:56Here's my 53%.
00:10:57Thank you very much, government,
00:10:58for all the great stuff you do,
00:10:59for all the services you provide.
00:11:00- Now fuck off.
00:11:01- Now fuck off and leave me alone.
00:11:03And that's not the case anymore when this passes.
00:11:05Bernie Sanders, Ro Khanna, all these national politicians,
00:11:09AOC, Elizabeth Warren, they're all saying
00:11:11we need to have a national wealth tax now.
00:11:13So it's not just in California.
00:11:15This is gonna be the issue between 2026 and 2028.
00:11:19The elites are the billionaires and the tech people.
00:11:22They're coming after them.
00:11:23And the manifestation of that is to create this wealth tax.
00:11:25And that gives the government the system
00:11:27by which private property rights are gone.
00:11:29And the United States is a very questionable future
00:11:31at that point.
00:11:32That's the thing I worry about the most.
00:11:34And I juxtapose that with my optimism about the future
00:11:38and this amazing shit.
00:11:39Like, I mean, think about it.
00:11:40Like this amazing shit that's happening in the world.
00:11:44We're gonna have free fucking energy.
00:11:45We're gonna live forever.
00:11:47We're gonna have all of this insane stuff
00:11:49that we never imagined, abundance and resources
00:11:51that we could never contemplate.
00:11:53Happiness, spending time with family, working less hours,
00:11:57robots that build shit for us.
00:11:58Everything is gonna get better.
00:12:00Everything is getting better.
00:12:01Everything is getting more amazing.
00:12:02And then we're like, let's fuck ourselves.
00:12:05Like, why not?
00:12:07'Cause we'll just fuck ourselves.
00:12:08That's, and you know, this is this principle of like,
00:12:13I don't like using the term good versus evil,
00:12:15but it's like, are you thinking about the future
00:12:17optimistically or pessimistically?
00:12:19If you're thinking about the future
00:12:21as these are control system.
00:12:22This is, these tech guys are crazy.
00:12:25This is dystopian, blah, blah, blah.
00:12:26You know, the number one most unfavorable thing
00:12:29in the United States right now
00:12:30according to a recent poll is AI.
00:12:31More unfavorable than Donald Trump,
00:12:33more unfavorable than everything.
00:12:35It's the most unfavorable thing because it is this,
00:12:38like this narrative that everyone's been instituted
00:12:40in their minds that like, this is the thing that destroys us,
00:12:42yada yada, and that's the choice we have.
00:12:45That's the choice we have right now
00:12:46is do we wanna walk this path of abundance
00:12:49or do we wanna lock ourselves up?
00:12:51And I will say the counterbalancing force,
00:12:53and people won't like hearing this,
00:12:55but the counterbalancing force in the world
00:12:57will be a place like China.
00:12:59Because if the United States walks this path,
00:13:01other countries will not walk this path
00:13:04and it will glean the benefits they're in.
00:13:07And we have to recognize that.
00:13:10- A quick aside, there is a stat that genuinely surprised me
00:13:13when I first heard it.
00:13:1395% of people don't get enough fiber.
00:13:17Not because they're being careless,
00:13:18but because hitting your daily fiber target
00:13:21through food alone is actually quite hard,
00:13:23but that's why momentous built fiber plus.
00:13:26See fiber isn't just a digestion thing.
00:13:29It's the foundation of your gut health,
00:13:31which drives how well you absorb nutrients,
00:13:33how stable your energy is, and how quickly you recover.
00:13:35If your gut isn't dialed in,
00:13:37everything else that you're doing
00:13:38is working at a fraction of its potential.
00:13:40Fiber plus is a three in one formula
00:13:42built to address digestion, gut barrier strength,
00:13:44and blood sugar stability all at once.
00:13:47And this cinnamon flavor is unreal.
00:13:50You might think fiber, wow, I bet that tastes great.
00:13:54Well, yeah, actually it does, doubters.
00:13:56I really enjoyed this.
00:13:57Best of all, momentous offers a 30 day money back guarantee.
00:14:00So if you're not sure you can buy fiber plus,
00:14:02try it for 29 days.
00:14:03If you don't love it,
00:14:04they'll just give you your money back
00:14:05and they ship internationally.
00:14:06Right now you can get up to 35% off your first subscription
00:14:09and that 30 day money back guarantee
00:14:11by going to the link in the description below
00:14:13or heading to livemomentous.com/modernwisdom
00:14:16and using the code modernwisdom at checkout.
00:14:18That's L-I-V-E-M-O-M-E-N-T-O-U-S.com/modernwisdom
00:14:22and modernwisdom at checkout.

Key Takeaway

California's fiscal stability is unraveling due to $1 trillion in unfunded liabilities and inefficient spending, leading to a proposed wealth tax that threatens fundamental private property rights and accelerates a mass exodus of the technology sector.

Highlights

An informal survey of core technology leaders in California indicates that 87% intend to leave the state.

California faces a massive public pension shortfall estimated between $600 billion and $1 trillion.

A state homeless program spent $220 million with a documented success rate of only six people exiting the cycle of poverty.

California's proposed Billionaire Tax Act introduces a 5% net worth tax that establishes a legal precedent for taxing post-tax private property.

The original U.S. income tax in 1913 was 1% on incomes over $3,000, but the top rate reached 94% during World War II.

Artificial Intelligence currently holds the highest unfavorable rating in U.S. public opinion polls, exceeding ratings for prominent political figures.

Timeline

The Technology Sector Exodus

  • Core technology leaders are migrating out of California at an accelerating rate.
  • Informal polling within tech executive groups shows an 87% intent to relocate.
  • Emerging startup CEOs are choosing states like Nevada over Northern California to avoid future regulatory uncertainty.

The prosperity engine that powered California since the 1800s is currently experiencing a fundamental unraveling. High-growth companies and established industry leaders are actively seeking exits due to concerns over the state's direction. This shift is driven by a fear of what policies will be implemented next to cover the state's fiscal gaps.

Fiscal Mismanagement and Failed Public Spending

  • California maintains the highest tax rate in the country primarily to fund inefficient public projects.
  • The California High-Speed Rail project has consumed $30 billion with zero operational results and a history of leadership turnover.
  • Public programs often show extreme cost-to-result ratios, such as a $220 million homeless initiative helping only six individuals.

Politicians secure election by promising benefits that the state lacks the resources to fulfill, leading to a cycle of systemic dishonesty. Success in Silicon Valley provided a massive tax base that was redirected into projects with little to no utility. The resulting system prioritizes maintaining power and cash flow over actual problem-solving or infrastructure delivery.

The $1 Trillion Pension and Liability Crisis

  • Unfunded public pension guarantees in California have created a debt hole ranging from $600 billion to $1 trillion.
  • Retirement and healthcare benefits promised to union workers were never properly funded during the initial agreements.
  • The state currently lacks a viable mechanism to meet these long-term financial obligations.

Changes made to the pension system over the last 15 years created retirement guarantees that the state cannot afford. These liabilities are now coming due, forcing the government to find aggressive new ways to fill the deficit. The resulting chaos is described as a 'sinking ship' scenario where residents and capital are fleeing the mounting debt.

The Precedent of the Wealth Tax

  • The Billionaire Tax Act introduces a 5% tax on net worth, targeting assets that have already been subjected to income tax.
  • Wealth taxes require the government to conduct invasive annual assessments of all personal property, including art, cars, and stocks.
  • Implementing a wealth tax at any threshold gives the legislature the power to lower those thresholds for the general population in the future.

A wealth tax fundamentally degrades private property rights by allowing the state to seize a portion of owned assets rather than just a portion of new income. This policy shift mirrors the historical expansion of the income tax, which began as a narrow 1% levy on the wealthy before becoming a universal requirement. If 51% of the population can vote to take the property of the remaining 49%, the system effectively transitions into a socialist model that consumes itself.

Historical Tax Progression and Property Rights

  • The U.S. income tax was originally a temporary wartime measure with a 1% rate on high earners.
  • By 1944, the top income tax rate escalated to 94% to fund World War II efforts.
  • A national wealth tax is now being championed by prominent federal politicians as a primary policy issue for 2026-2028.

Tax precedents established during times of crisis, like the New Deal or World War II, rarely revert and typically escalate over time. The transition from taxing income to taxing existing property removes the 'leave me alone' boundary between the citizen and the state. This movement targets billionaires and tech leaders as 'elites' to justify the erosion of the private property foundation upon which the country was built.

Optimism vs. Dystopian Control

  • Technological advancements promise a future of free energy, increased longevity, and resource abundance.
  • AI is currently viewed more unfavorably by the American public than any political candidate.
  • If the U.S. chooses restrictive regulatory paths, nations like China will likely capture the resulting economic and technological benefits.

There is a sharp contrast between the potential for technological abundance and the current drive toward social and fiscal control. The public's fear of AI is fueled by a narrative of disaster, which may lead the U.S. to 'lock itself up' while competitors embrace the shift. The ultimate choice for the future is between a path of abundance or a path of self-imposed stagnation through high-tax control systems.

Community Posts

View all posts