dont waste your time with grokbot

CChase AI
Computing/SoftwareInternet Technology

Transcript

00:00:00So GrokBot is the latest tool being hyped up by your favorite AI influencer, which is kind of a
00:00:04shame because this thing is actually a complete waste of time and it will cost you $200 a month
00:00:09to even use. Now GrokBot is being billed as the easiest way to create a team of agents. Think
00:00:14OpenClaw or Hermes, but this is inside the XAI ecosystem, which means you can only use Grok.
00:00:20But if you're someone who already knows how to use ClaudeCode or Codex, is there any point at all
00:00:24in taking the time to learn GrokBot? Well, in this video, we're going to cut through the hype
00:00:29and answer that question. Although I think you already know the answer. So let's talk about what
00:00:34GrokBot actually is. It's an interface that allows you to spin up a bunch of agents. All these agents
00:00:39have Grok in the background and you can assign them to do different tasks. The sell here is that you
00:00:44can have multiple bots working at once. They can talk to one another and they can work even when
00:00:49your computer is closed. So they have a virtual server that they're all running in. It's a virtual
00:00:54computer. That's how they're able to talk to one another. That's how they're able to share files.
00:00:58And what you hear a lot of people say in other videos is that each agent gets their own computer.
00:01:01That is not true. They're sharing one computer. You can connect it to pretty much any major app. So
00:01:06think Google Workspace, Slack, GitHub, Vercel, all that. And so you can control everything from
00:01:12GrokBot. And you have things like skills and routines, just like you would inside a Claude
00:01:17code. And the idea is that these bots get smarter over time. So as they run something,
00:01:22they can check the previous context, see if it worked and sort of update themselves.
00:01:26If this sounds extremely similar to things like Hermes and OpenClock, that's exactly what this is.
00:01:30This is a very polished version of those sorts of tools. And again, it's under the XAI umbrella.
00:01:36It also has a pretty slick iOS app. So controlling all this from your phone is pretty easy.
00:01:40But then we run into issues right away when we talk about pricing. Remember, XAI now owns Cursor.
00:01:45So in order to get a GrokBot that has its own computer, which is one of the big cells,
00:01:50you need to be spending $200 a month on the Cursor Ultra plan. Now that comes with Cursor as well.
00:01:56But understand, this is $200 a month just to get essentially one of the finding features of this
00:02:01thing. The other major issue with GrokBot is that it is the GrokBot. This is not the ClaudeBot.
00:02:06This is not the GPTBot. You can only use Grok with this. We can't just mix and match whatever
00:02:11model we want to do our job. So with that in mind, who is this thing actually for? Is this for people
00:02:17who use ClaudeCode or use Codex? Absolutely not. Is this for people who use Hermes and OpenClaw?
00:02:22I would argue also no. The only sort of like demographic that would get a lot of use out of
00:02:28this is someone who wants to be a Hermes user, who wants to be an OpenClaw user, but isn't
00:02:33technically adept enough and instead is willing to shell out $200 a month to sort of have it pre-built
00:02:38for them. If that's you, great. Enjoy it. But if that's not you, there's pretty much no point
00:02:44to using this thing, especially because we can do all this inside of ClaudeCode or Codex
00:02:48for cheaper. So here I am inside of GrokBot. One of the big cells is I can spawn a bunch of agents
00:02:53to do work on my behalf. If I want to start a new one, I just hit new chat and I have the ability
00:02:57to create a new bot. I can then easily edit the profile of that bot. I can say, you are now the
00:03:03coding bot. You do code and you are responsible for all tasks related to coding projects.
00:03:14And that's great. But how is this a step forward in any way from what we can do inside of ClaudeCodex?
00:03:19I mean, if I'm inside the ClaudeCode desktop app and I want another agent, guess what I have to do?
00:03:24I just press the plus button. I now have another agent and then I can spawn another one and another
00:03:30one from inside the terminal. All right, here's one agent.
00:03:37There's a second agent. Here's a third agent. I'm failing to see what the point of this is and how
00:03:44this is any sort of leap forward. The second thing that gets hyped up about CrockBot is I can have all
00:03:48these different sub agents be responsible for different things. So I have this content bot that does stuff.
00:03:53I have this research bot that does research. I have my Google bot that has to do with Google and you just
00:03:57saw the coding bot. How is this any different from me just spawning another sub-agent here, not even
00:04:04another sub-agent, just another chat and using literally any skill I want for a specific task?
00:04:11Again, how is this a leap forward? Now, the one thing CrockBot does do that makes it a very smooth
00:04:16experience is how these agents essentially talk to one another. So using research bot, I told it to find
00:04:22information about GrockBot and I said, send your finding to the content bot. And it did that in an
00:04:27extremely smooth process. But in terms of your practical day-to-day, is this a huge differentiator
00:04:34between just running something or multiple skills under the same umbrella in different chats here
00:04:39inside of Claude or Codex? Furthermore, if I want my sub-agents or I want my agents to talk to one
00:04:44another, I mean, Claude just came out with that ability, what, a couple of days ago? And secondly,
00:04:49if that's something I really want to do all the time, I can have them create some sort of document
00:04:53in my code base and log changes there. Third, in terms of how often are you having sub-agents
00:04:58actually talk to one another regularly? It's not something I think you do that often. Now,
00:05:05GrockBot is able to do this in part because of this virtual computer they're all running on and
00:05:11sharing. And you're looking at their screen right now. Now, this is a great thing. And this is actually
00:05:15pretty smooth in terms of setting this up. Like, it's all automatically set up for you.
00:05:20Which is why I said this is essentially a nicely wrapped Hermes or OpenClaw clone.
00:05:26We could do this with Claude Code, right? We could set up inside of a VPS or I have a Mac Mini. Like,
00:05:30we can have routines and stuff run over and over all the time. But if we're doing that with Hermes or
00:05:34OpenClaw, it does require a bit of setup. With GrockBot, it's just like that out of the box.
00:05:39But is that worth the $200 a month premium to essentially have that set up for you? I would argue
00:05:46no. Secondly, the type of person who wants this thing is probably technically adept enough to get
00:05:53it running on their own, which brings us back to the question of like, who is this even for?
00:05:58Now, I've been kind of hammering GrockBot in comparison to Claude and Codex. And I don't think
00:06:02anyone is seriously saying that it is any sort of replacement. But I felt like I wanted to make this
00:06:08video because you watch all these things about GrockBot and you think this was some like major
00:06:13tier one AI tool that all of a sudden is on the scene that, you know, is changing the paradigm here.
00:06:18Like, it's not. This is literally not. This is literally a slick, you know, very user-friendly
00:06:23OpenClaw, which is fine. But again, I feel like when you kind of pump the brakes when these sort of
00:06:29things come out, because most of the people watching this, watching these videos, know how to use
00:06:33Claude Code and know how to use Codex. And I think they kind of get sent in the wrong direction,
00:06:37have their time wasted when all they need to really do is learn how to use the tools they
00:06:41already have better. So if you are not an aspiring Hermes or OpenClaw user who is completely flustered
00:06:47with the setup, then GrockBot isn't for you.

Key Takeaway

GrokBot offers a polished interface for multi-agent workflows on a shared virtual computer, but it wastes $200 a month for users who can already build identical setups using Claude Code or Codex.

Highlights

  • GrokBot costs $200 a month under the Cursor Ultra plan to run agents on a shared virtual computer.

  • GrokBot restricts users exclusively to the Grok model without options to mix and match other AI models.

  • GrokBot functions as a polished, pre-built wrapper for open-source multi-agent frameworks like Hermes and OpenClaw.

  • Tools like Claude Code and Codex achieve multi-agent workflows and chat spawning natively without extra monthly costs.

Timeline

Overview and Core Features of GrokBot

  • GrokBot operates as an interface within the XAI ecosystem to spin up and manage multiple agents running on a shared virtual computer.
  • Agents communicate with each other, share files, connect to apps like Google Workspace and Slack, and run even when the local computer is closed.
  • The system incorporates skills, routines, and contextual updates, functioning as a polished version of tools like OpenClaw and Hermes.

GrokBot is marketed as an easy solution for deploying a team of AI agents powered by Grok. Multiple agents share a single virtual computer running in the background, allowing them to collaborate and pass files back and forth. The platform features an iOS app and integrations with major applications, positioning itself as a user-friendly entry point into multi-agent automation.

Pricing and Ecosystem Limitations

  • Accessing GrokBot with a dedicated virtual computer requires the Cursor Ultra plan priced at $200 a month.
  • GrokBot locks users entirely into the Grok model family without allowing model swapping between different providers.
  • The high price tag and model restriction limit utility mostly to users who want pre-built agent setups and lack the technical background to configure OpenClaw.

The pricing structure requires a hefty monthly subscription tied to the Cursor Ultra plan just to secure the virtual computer environment. Furthermore, the mandatory reliance on Grok prevents users from leveraging superior coding or reasoning models like Claude. This makes the tool inefficient for experienced developers who require flexibility across different AI architectures.

Comparison with Existing Developer Tools

  • Spawning multiple agents or chats in Claude Code or Codex accomplishes the exact same workflow functionality without a premium subscription.
  • Setting up virtual private servers or local environments for OpenClaw achieves identical automation capabilities for free.
  • GrokBot primarily serves individuals who want pre-configured multi-agent setups but lack the technical skills to run open-source alternatives.

Native terminals inside tools like Claude Code provide seamless agent spawning, custom profiles, and cross-chat communication with simple button clicks. While GrokBot automates the initial configuration out of the box, the $200 price premium is unnecessary for anyone capable of using standard developer environments or open-source agent frameworks.

Community Posts

No posts yet. Be the first to write about this video!

Write about this video