00:00:00In my new book, I talk about this trial that took place in Norway when there was, you know,
00:00:09Norway has so much less crime, so much less violent crime than the United States does.
00:00:15They incarcerate way fewer people.
00:00:17They incarcerate them in less harsh institutions for much shorter periods of time.
00:00:23And it's very rare for them to have, like, a mass shooting event.
00:00:27But they did.
00:00:30They had this guy, Anders Breivik, who shot, I think, 60 children on an island.
00:00:38They were there for a summer camp.
00:00:40It was the worst mass murder in Norway's history.
00:00:44This is someone who had terrible genetic and environmental luck.
00:00:49He had a very unstable mother.
00:00:53And it also -- he was described as someone who was antisocial from the time he was three
00:00:57or four.
00:00:59Norway has this incredible wraparound social welfare state.
00:01:03And so you can see the --
00:01:06High visibility.
00:01:07-- the notes from the social worker being, like, this child is aggressive and violent.
00:01:12The other kids won't be -- aren't allowed to play with him because he keeps torturing their
00:01:14pets when he's five.
00:01:17So even in this environment where there's incredible social resources, this person still grew up
00:01:24and still grew up to be violent.
00:01:26I found the trial fascinating because they ultimately sentenced him to the maximum sentence
00:01:36in Norway, which is 21 years.
00:01:38Doesn't seem like a lot.
00:01:39It's what, like, four months per child?
00:01:43And they gave him -- he's in the maximum security prison, which there was an Instagram meme,
00:01:50which is, is this a Norwegian prison or a London hotel room?
00:01:55And people can't tell the difference between them.
00:01:57The only thing that puts it away is the security camera dome on the ceiling of the prison room.
00:02:03So things that seem quite cushy for an American system.
00:02:08And in the trial, you see the reckoning of a society where they are saying, this person
00:02:17did a horrible thing.
00:02:19We have our maximum retributive impulses towards him.
00:02:24Of course we do.
00:02:25He murdered our children.
00:02:28And he is still one of us.
00:02:30And how will it corrupt us and our culture to indulge those maximum impulses?
00:02:36So we want to keep our society safe, but we're recognizing that he's still one of us.
00:02:42He's still Norwegian.
00:02:43He's still part of our society.
00:02:45And from an American perspective, it was wild, like, reading this trial transcript because
00:02:52it was a way of feeling that retribution, but not leading entirely with it and also recognizing
00:03:04the inherent humanity of this person who's part of their society.
00:03:09Do you think somebody that shot 60 kids has that much humanity?
00:03:12I think we all have that humanity.
00:03:15I mean, I think that's what it comes down to.
00:03:16I think that every single person, even when they do horrible things, is still human.
00:03:23And also that even if they don't, that me treating them like they don't does something to my humanity.
00:03:31That seems to be two different arguments.
00:03:34They are.
00:03:35So they're related.
00:03:36Yeah, of course.
00:03:37Yeah.
00:03:38I'm trying to separate them out.
00:03:39I mean, yeah.
00:03:40I was going to try, I was about to say something before that my ability to flip empathy into
00:03:48pleasure at a defect as pain pathway is defunct.
00:03:55I always seem to err on the side of, "Oh, I'm so sorry for that person."
00:04:01Always, always, always.
00:04:05You've managed to find an example where, not just one, but it tends to be, my threshold
00:04:10for it tends to be a bit higher.
00:04:12So I'm thinking about this person that shot 60 kids.
00:04:19The residual amount of humanity in that person seems to be very low for me in how I would
00:04:24see them.
00:04:26That to me seems to be the kind of thing, even if you were to say, "What does this do for
00:04:30society outside of it?"
00:04:32That is such a heinous crime, I'd say.
00:04:37It is so far beyond even the normality of abnormal crime that that should be a, you don't get
00:04:47to come out again.
00:04:48And that would be a pro-social, as far as I can see, that would be a pro-social thing to
00:04:51do.
00:04:52I would say, "Hey, we have a limit here in Sweden."
00:04:56Norway.
00:04:57Norway.
00:04:58"Here in Norway, we have a limit.
00:05:00We may be very loving and a fun accent, like a typewriter covered in foil kicked downstairs,
00:05:06but this person has gone beyond the limit, therefore, other people shouldn't."
00:05:13So I guess warning them off.
00:05:16But the other one being like, that is such an extreme crime.
00:05:22The likelihood of ... Even if his desire to murder children drops by one per year over
00:05:29the next six decades, he still wants to murder a child.
00:05:35I'm aware that's not the way that a fall off a murder desire was.
00:05:38I got this weird line graph in my head.
00:05:42Of course.
00:05:43It's murder, desire, inertia, or whatever the fuck.
00:05:48To me, that seems weak.
00:05:49That seems wimpy.
00:05:50But I don't think that that is a sufficient deterrent to others, and I also don't think
00:05:55it is a sufficient amount of time to basically quarantine this person.
00:06:00So there's so many different threads in your argument, and I want to pull them apart because
00:06:06I think they're each interesting.
00:06:07And in some ways, it's like you just touched on why do we incarcerate people?
00:06:13Why do we have a criminal legal system?
00:06:15What is the purpose of it, right?
00:06:17And one is just containment, just protecting the other people from this person, right?
00:06:25I do believe in Norway, it's possible that at the end of the sentence, he's judged to
00:06:30still be a risk to others than he could be ... That sentence could be lengthened for the
00:06:34sake of other people.
00:06:37One is some sort of expression of retribution.
00:06:42I don't care if you could be better in the future.
00:06:45I don't care if you're going to have a- You lost that privilege.
00:06:48You've lost the privilege.
00:06:52You did something that's beyond the pale, and now you deserve to not live.
00:06:58You deserve to suffer.
00:06:59You deserve whatever that is.
00:07:01And then one of them is rehabilitation.
00:07:05So given that someone has done this, is there some intervention by the state, by other people
00:07:14that can prevent it from happening again, essentially repair this person, and repair their relationship
00:07:23to the community, such that they don't commit any more violent crime?
00:07:30And we don't stick with ... We don't have one lane.
00:07:34Your answer combined all of those things, where you're like, "But what if he's still a danger,
00:07:40and also he did such a horrible thing.
00:07:42Maybe it doesn't matter if he's a danger, and also if this is such a long-rooted problem,
00:07:47how could he ever hope to change?"
00:07:51I'm really interested by the word weak.
00:07:55What is it?
00:07:56It's weak by the state.
00:07:58It's weak by the juror.
00:08:02It reflects weak social bonds.
00:08:05What is being weak where?
00:08:09That's an interesting ... It is insufficient when held up.
00:08:20You asked me earlier on, this person stabbed one guy with a boxcar.
00:08:23Yeah, and you're like 25 years.
00:08:24Yeah, I gave him 20 years.
00:08:26Homeboy managed to do it to 60 children.
00:08:29Have you considered the role of 120 parents needing to feel vindicated?
00:08:40I mean, I think there's this idea of vindication and also this sense of ... I guess I should
00:08:47say I was very moved by this outcome.
00:08:49I'm not saying that you're defending the guy just doing the thing or getting the 20 years.
00:08:53But I do think it speaks to a very different way of thinking of the role and function of
00:08:59punishment in a society, because it is so radically different from what we would do in the United
00:09:03States.
00:09:04But I just want to echo, I'm a mother.
00:09:06I have three kids.
00:09:08If I were one of those parents, would I be able to coolly sit here and talk to you about
00:09:13not letting the retributive instinct lead?
00:09:16I'm not sure.
00:09:17The only time I've ever blacked out in anger was when someone hurt one of my children.
00:09:22I think there's a really basic thing in there.
00:09:24And I think the other thing that you're getting at is we signal the value of people by how
00:09:34much we're willing to punish others who've hurt them.
00:09:39So when we say one of the things that denotes or it comes along with the status of being
00:09:53an enslaved person in a culture is that their masters get to hurt them, and there's no punishment
00:10:01for that, right?
00:10:03So I think one of the things you're picking up on when you say, "What about those parents?"
00:10:09is does it signal something about the value of those children or the value of those children
00:10:15to their parents or their society, to the collective, if someone is not punished for hurting them?
00:10:24A lot of times when someone does something outrageous, not even outrageous as mass murder,
00:10:31we say, "Who do you think you are?"
00:10:36And I think that's saying, "Who do you think I am that you think you can get away with treating
00:10:41me like this?"
00:10:42So we assert the value of people.
00:10:43Correct.
00:10:44That's part of the social signal of punishment.
00:10:45And I think that's why it rankles.
00:10:49And I don't think there's any response to harm, especially harm at that level where there isn't
00:10:59going to be some remainder that feels unsatisfying.
00:11:03Kill him.
00:11:06Burn him and kill him.
00:11:07String him up and burn him and kill him.
00:11:08What does that do to us, right?
00:11:10I think what does that do to our society's, again, honoring of the inherent value of every
00:11:22human if we are so easy for anyone to say, "String him up," good riddance?
00:11:30There is a really that our response to our most antisocial people can bring out the most
00:11:37callous and unemotional and anti-social instincts of ourselves where you would never and under
00:11:45any circumstances be like, "Let him die," but in this case, it comes so easily to us.
00:11:52So again, I don't think there is a perfect solution to the problem of harm, but I do think
00:11:58by looking to other societies, we can begin to think, "Well, what are we overemphasizing
00:12:05in our approach to this?"
00:12:07Which is very people deserve to suffer, and our job is just to figure out how much they
00:12:13deserve to suffer.
00:12:14Before we continue, I've been drinking AG1 every morning for as long as I can remember
00:12:20now because it is the simplest way I've found to cover my bases and not overthink nutrition,
00:12:25and that is why I partnered with them.
00:12:27Just one scoop gives you 75 vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and whole food ingredients in
00:12:31a single drink.
00:12:32Now they've taken it a step further with AG1 NextGen, the same one scoop, once a day ritual,
00:12:38but this time backed by four clinical trials.
00:12:40In those trials, it was shown to fill common nutrient gaps, improve key nutrient levels
00:12:44in just three months, and increase healthy gut bacteria by 10 times even in people who
00:12:48already eat well.
00:12:50They've upgraded their formula with better probiotics, more bioavailable nutrients, and
00:12:54clinical validation.
00:12:55Plus, it's still NSF certified for sport, so you know that the quality is legit.
00:12:59Right now, when you first subscribe, you can get a free bottle of D3K2 and AG1 Welcome Kit,
00:13:04plus bonus AG1 travel packs.
00:13:06And for a limited time, US customers also get a sample of AGZ and a bottle of Omega 3s.
00:13:11Just go to the link in the description below or head to drinkag1.com/modernwisdom.
00:13:17That's drinkag1.com/modernwisdom.
00:13:22Thank you very much for tuning in, ooh, a tasty morsel of a clip there for you.
00:13:26Well, the full episode is available right here.
00:13:30Come on.
00:13:31That's it.